Telangana High Court
WP/41051/2014 of N.Sunitha, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2014
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.41051 of 2014 Date:31.12.2014 Between: N.Sunitha, W/o M.Y.Narasimhulu ..... Petitioner And: The State of A.P., reptd by its Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Addula Triveni
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.41051 of 2014Date:31.12.2014
Between:
N.Sunitha,W/o M.Y.Narasimhulu
..... Petitioner
And:
The State of A.P.,reptd by its Secretary,Civil Supplies Department,Hyderabad and three others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Addula Triveni Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following:ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declarethe action of respondent No.4, in not allotting the essentialcommodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop fordistribution, only on the ground of pendency of theproceedings under Section 6-A of the EssentialCommodities Act, 1955 (forshort ‘the Act’) against thepetitioner, as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) submitted thatdue to the pendency of the proceedings under Section 6-Aof the Act, the essential commodities are not being allottedto the petitioner for distribution.
In my opinion, mere pendency of the proceedingsunder Section 6-A of the Act would not disentitle thepetitioner to function as the fair price shop dealer so long as her authorization continues to subsist. Therefore,respondent No.4 is directed to allot the essentialcommodities to the petitioner’s fair price shop fordistribution from the month of January, 2015 onwards solong as her authorization remains in force.
Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isdisposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,WPMP.No.51406 of 2014 filed by the petitioner for interimrelief is disposed of as infructuous.
___________________________
JUSTICE
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
31[st] December 2014DR