Telangana High Court
WP/28101/2007 of Smt.N.Hema, Vs The Joint Collector (C.S.)-II, on 28 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION No.28101 of 2007 Between: Smt. N. Hema … Petitioner Versus The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVENP R E S E N TTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * * WRIT PETITION No.28101 of 2007Between:Smt. N. Hema … Petitioner Versus The Joint Collector (CS)-II & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri B. LINGAIAH YADAV
Counsel for the Respondents: GOVT.PLEADER FOR CIVILSUPPLIES
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * *
WRIT PETITION No.28101 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R :
Heard both the counsel. The matter is coming up ‘foradmission’.
2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, to setaside the impugned order of the R-1 No.C/1527/2007 dated 20-12-2007 in favour of the petitioner’s fair price shop at Bandlagudavillage, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district,consequently to direct the respondent to supply the essentialcommodities to the petitioner’s shop and to pass such othersuitable orders as this Court may deems fit and proper in thecircumstances of the case.
3. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed insupport of the writ petition.
4. This Court is not inclined to express any opinion relating tothe merits and demerits of the matter for the reason that it isstated that an appeal had been preferred on the file of the firstrespondent and the same is pending disposal.
5. Let the first respondent dispose of the appeal and passappropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within aperiod of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder and till then the impugned order is hereby suspended.
6. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs.
JUSTICE P . S .
NARAYANA .
28/12/2007.
NB:1) Operative Portion of the Order by wire at party’s costs.
2) Furnish CC of the order tomorrow.
B/o. ISL