Telangana High Court
WP/37993/2014 of Vegi Divakar Rao, S/o Sambasiva Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2014
OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOs.29406, 31848, 32245, 33551, 35363, 37993, 38380 AND 38581 OF 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NOs.29406, 31848, 32245, 33551, 35363, 37993,38380 AND 38581 OF 2014
DATED:31.12.2014
W.P. No.29406 of 2014
Between:
Krupasagar Reddy
and others
… Petitioners
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh,Agriculture & Cooperation (Mktg-I) DepartmentRep. by its Principal Secretary Secretariat Hyderabad and another … Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NOs.29406, 31848, 32245, 33551, 35363, 37993,38380 AND 38581 OF 2014
COMMON ORDER:(per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
The learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradeshplaced a latest amendment made, vide Act No.10 of 2014, to theAndhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act,1966. When the writ petitions were filed Section 38 was inserted to thePrincipal Act. However, during the pendency of this matter, Section 38has been omitted. Therefore, the cause for filing of the writ petitionsdoes not subsisting now. A copy of the Gazette Notification regardingthe aforesaid amendment is kept on record.
Accordingly, we close the writ petitions with the aboveobservations.
Learned counsel for the petitioners says that his clients mayhave to take further action in the light of this amendment. It would beopen for the petitioners to do so, if so advised, in accordance with law.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. There will be no order as to costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
31.12.2014
bnr/gbs