Telangana High Court
CRLP/15960/2014 of Kosuri Venkateswara Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.15960 of 2014 ORDER : The petitioners, who are accused Nos. 240 and 241, filed the present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking release in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.45 of 2014 of Addateegala Police
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMARCRIMINAL PETITION No.15960 of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioners, who are accused Nos. 240 and 241, filedthe present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seekingrelease in the event of their arrest in connection with CrimeNo.45 of 2014 of Addateegala Police Station, East GodavariDistrict, registered for the offences punishable under Sections409, 420, 419, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of IPC.The facts in issue are as under:
The Chief Regional Manager of Indian Overseas Bankaddressed a letter to the Additional Director General of Police,CID, Hyderabad informing him that one K. Bhaskara Chary,Branch Manager, Rayapalli Branch, East Godavari District,granted loans to 16 borrowers under the influence of middleman by abusing his official position during the period from09.06.2012 to 13.08.2013. Due to the said act, the bank isalleged to have suffered a loss to the extent of Rs.13,70,000/-.The main allegation is that certain persons obtained loans fromthe bank without having any land whatsoever basing on thefabricated pattadar pass books and title deeds. On the basis ofthese allegations, the above case came to be registered.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
A perusal of the material placed before the Court wouldshow that earlier, A-34 filed Crl.P.No.14353 of 2014, seekinganticipatory bail. By an order dated 25.11.2014, this Courtdisposed of the said petition, giving liberty to the petitioner therein to surrender before the learned Magistrate concernedand move for regular bail after giving notice to learned PublicProsecutor concerned, and in such an event, the learnedMagistrate was directed to deal with the same on merits eitheron the same day or at least by next day, in accordance with law.Since the petitioners herein also stand on the same footing asthat of A-34, they are also entitled to the same relief as grantedby this Court in Crl.P.No.14353 of 2014.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of givingliberty to the petitioners to surrender before the learnedMagistrate and move for regular bail after giving notice to thelearned Public Prosecutor concerned, and in such an event, thelearned Magistrate shall deal with the same on merits either onthe same day, or at least the next day, in accordance with law.
_______________________________
JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR30[th] December, 2014 cbs THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
cbs
CRIMINAL PETITION No.15960 of 2014
30[th] December, 2014