Telangana High Court
WP/24826/2004 of A.Manik Reddy S/o.A.Shankar Reddy Vs I.B.P.Company Limited on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24826 of 2004 Between: A.Manik Reddy S/o.A.Shankar Reddy Plot No.90 5-3-181, Shantinagar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24826 of 2004
Between:
A.Manik Reddy S/o.A.Shankar Reddy Plot No.90 5-3-181, Shantinagar,
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 I.B.P:.Company Limited rep by it General Manager Chetput, Chennai.
2 The Divisional Manager I.B.P.Company Ltd, Complex, S.D.Road,Secunderabad.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, Order or Direction,declaring the action of the Respondents in not declaring the results of the interviewconduced on 29-11-2004 as illegal and arbitrary by directing the Respondents toforthwith declare the results of the interview conducted on 29-11-2004 pertaining toaward of M&H contract of IBP COCO (Retail outlet), Begumpet, immediately, Awardcosts and pass such other or further orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE
The Court at the stage of admission made the following :
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO.24826 OF 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in notdeclaring the results of the interviews conducted on 29.11.2004 pertaining to awardof maintenance and handling contract of I.B.P.COCO Retail Outlet, Begumpet,Hyderabad.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that theselection process itself is cancelled and the respondent company has taken a policydecision to run the retail outlet at Begumpet on its own with effect from 28.12.2004.Learned Standing Counsel also filed an affidavit sworn by the second respondent tothat effect. The operative portion, reads as under; “I respectfully submit that, I have received instructions from my superior authorities in theHead Office and Regional Office to state that, the interviews conducted for selection ofmaintenance and handling contractors on 29.11.2004 and the recommendation of theselection committee pursuant to the said interview are cancelled.
I respectfully submit on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2 that, as per the policy decisiontaken by the company, the retain outlet at Begumpet shall be maintained and handled by thecompany itself with effect from 28.12.2004 without appointment of any maintenance andhandling contractor.”
In view of the policy decision taken by the respondent company to run the subjectpetroleum bunk on its own, no further orders are required to be passed in the presentwrit petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. No costs.
31.12.2004
mdaa/tvk
copy to:
1 I.B.P:.Company Limited rep by it General Manager Chetput, Chennai. Chetput, Chennai.
2 The Divisional Manager I.B.P.Company Ltd, Complex, S.D.Road,Secunderabad. Complex, S.D.Road,Secunderabad.
3. Two C.D.copies.
______________
N.V.RAMANA,J