CRLRC/256/2008 of CHANNAMANENI KARUNAKAR RAO, Vs THE STATE OF A.P., REP BY PP., AND ANOTHER, on 29 December 2023

BAIL SLIP [: ][Trie Petitioner/ Accused was ][directed ][to ][be ][released on bail by ][the^]order of the [High ][court ][dated ][;;'6;2oo;'in ][cii ][r',t ][p ][uo ][361 of ][2008' ][in ][crl'R.c]INo.3032 [o][f ][2008]N THE HIG[H ][COURT FOR THE ][STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD. FRIDAY .-._ [THE ][TWENW ][NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER]TWO TUOUSAND [AND TWENTY THREE]!.PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][E.V. ][VENUGOPAL]I1GRI MINAL [REVtS][roN ][C][ASE][ NO:2][56][ oF ][2008]Criminali IRevision Case [under ][Secti][ons ][397&401 ][of ][Cr.P.C. against ][the]Judgment [d]1S.2.2OOB made [in Crl.APPea][I No.183/2006 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][Court]of the I Addinal Sessions [Judge, ][Karimanagar, ][P][refened against ][the ][Order]passed in CC [No.][561 ][of ][2003 ][dated ][22.11'2006 ][on][ the ][file of ][the Court ][of ][the][lMa][gistrate ][of ][First Class, Excise, Karimnagar]Special JudiciBetween:Channamaeni Karunakar [Rao,][ S/o. Kishan Rao, ][Occ: ][Business, ][R/o' ][H ][No ][9-]3eiA [(old),]-4-107(new ) Sreen[agai ][ColonY, ][Karimnagar District]i-,iu.PETITIONER;' ri..,fAND1The Sof A.P., through [Public Prosecutor, ][High ][Court of ][A ][P ]' [Hyderabad]2ThanneAnil Rao, S/o. [Anjan Rao, Occ: Business, Rl/o 9-6-169']Ramna, [Karimnagar.]...RESPONDENTSCounsel forPetitioner: SRl. VIVEK JAINCounsel for thRespondents: SRI C. SHARAN [REDDY]Counsel forRespondent No.1: ASSISTANT PUBLIC [PROSECUTOR]The Court mthe following:

HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][E'V'VENUGOPAL]CRIMINAL RE[VISIO]NCASE No.2S5 of 2OO8

oRDER:

This Criminal [Revision ][Case ][is ][filed under ][Sections ][397]and 401 [Cr.P.C' ][aggrieved ][by ][the judgment ][in ][C'C'No'561 of]dated [22'tl'2OO6 ][passed ][by the ][Special ][Judicial]2OO3, Magistrate [of First ][Class, ][Excise' ][Karimnagar ][as ][confirmed by]the [judgment ][in ][Crl'A'No' 183 of ][2OO6' ][dated ][lg ]['O2'2OO8 ][passed]by the I [Additional ][Sessions ][Judge' Karitnnagar']

2. Heard [the ][learned ][counsel for the petitioner ][as ][well ][as ][the]learned [Assistant Public ][Prosecutor appearing ][for ][respondent-]State.

By frling frling [[a ][Memo ]][[Memo ]][[uide ][USR'No ]][[USR'No ]]"114268 [[of 2023' ][learned]][[learned]]

3. By frling frling [[a ][Memo ]][[Memo ]][[uide ][USR'No ]][[USR'No ]]"114268 [[of 2023' ][learned]][[learned]]counsel [for the ][petitioner would submit ][that ][the notice ][sent to]the [petitioner was returned ][with ][an ][endorsement ]["Addressee]lrft" and [the ][consistent efforts ][made ][to ][contact ][the ][petitioner]have [gone ][in vain' ][Therefore' seeks ][to ][close ][the ][present]criminal [revision ][case ][as ]["Lack of ][Instructions" ][']

,I

4. Learned Assistalt Public Prosecutor appearing for therespondent-State is present and takes no objection to the same.

5. Taking on record the submissions made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this criminal revision case standsclosed, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out theremedies as available under law Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this crimina,lrevision case, shall also stand closed.

[[M.RAIIANAKRISHNA]][[RE][GTSTRAR]][[GTSTRAR]]SECTION [OFFICER]['m]SECTION [OFFICER]['m]

SD,[- ][[M.RAIIANAKRISHNA]]DEPUTY [[RE][GTSTRAR]][[GTSTRAR]]

,TTRUE [COPY/']

-i,.;sc

To,l*3;:',"15flu*mmm::--"

:ls

DL

g

*;#

HIGH COURT

DATEDi2gl12l2O23

ORDERCRLRC.No.256 [of ][2008]

CLOSING [THE ][CRIMINAL ][REVISION CASE]

09q.,go\

I,IIt:ffi,, : r:1' _ .i -;.i.

.itfrffi'i xH..ttihE [S14]14:I(6'(ilP3 27 [I'IAR ][2U24]offi**04

!ffi,r!