Telangana High Court
CRLP/13615/2018 of Durgam Ramanjaneyulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 December 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH } FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRLP NOS: 13615 AND 13645 OF 2018 CRLP NO: 13 615 0F 2014 Between: 1. Durgam
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH }FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHERCRLP NOS: 13615 AND 13645 OF 2018
CRLP NO: 13615 0F 2014
Between:
1. Durgam Ramanjaneyulu S/o. Nagappa.
2. C. Vengal Reddy, S/o. M.C. Rami Reddy
3. Bheemireddy Nageswara Reddy, S/o. Venkata Narayana Reddy
4. G. Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy.
Petitione r/Accused 3,4,5 & 11
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court atHyderabad, For the State ofTelangana and Andhra Pradesh, Through StationHouse Officer, Rapthadu Police Station, Ananthapur District.
Respondent/ Co m pla ina nt
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances statedin the petition filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge thepetitioners/Accused 3,4, 5 and 11 on bail in Crime No. 120 of 2015 on the file ofthe Rapthadu Police Station, Ananthapur District.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and thegrounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of N ASWARTHANARAYANA Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Additional Public Prosecutor(AP) forthe respondent.
CRLP NO: 13645 OF 2O18
Betweenl
1. Kesava Naidu @ Karnuthala Kesava Naidu S/o. K.Chinna Venkatesu (A-1)2. Nagaraju @ Dasari Nagaraju, S/o, Late Dasari Venkataramudu (A-7)
Petitio n erl Accused
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofludicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of AndhraPradesh.
Respo ndent/ Co m pla ina nt
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that ln the circumstances statedin the petition filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to direct the StationHouse Officer, Rapthadu Police Station to release the petitioners on bail in the eventof their arrest in connection with Crime No.120/2015 of Rapthadu Police Station,Ananthapur District, in the interest ofjustice.
Thqtrpetition&coming on for ihearing, upon perusing the Petitiont and thegrounds filed in support thereof andi upon hearing the arguments of Sri C SHARANREDDY Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Additional Public Prosecutor(AP) for therespondent, the Court made the following.REDDY Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Additional Public Prosecutor(AP) for therespondent, the Court made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Criminal Petition Nos.13615 of 2018 and 13645 of 2018, tnderSection 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, L973 (tor short 'Code'), arefiled by the petitioners/ accused Nos.3, 4 5 and 11 and accused Nos.1 and7, respectively, for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest inCrime No.120 of 2015 on the file of the Rapthadu Police Station,Ananthapur District, State of Andhra Pradesh, registered for the offencepunishable under Section 3O6 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Coder 1860.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in both the CriminalPetitions, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing therespondent-State and perused the record, 3, As per the material placed on record, it is evident that thedeceased - J. Adeppa was under huge pressure as he could not collect themoney payable to different persons and subsequently it led to commissionof suicide. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that accused Nos.2,8 and 10 were granted bail under Section 438 of the Code by this Courtvide order, dated 18.11,2016 in Criminal Petition No.15468 of 2O16, Underthe said circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant bail to thepetitioners/accused Nos.3,4,5 and 11 and accused Nos.1 and 7 underSection 438 of the Code.
4, Accordingly, the petitioners/ accused accused Nos.1, 3, 4 5,7 and11 are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, RapthaduPolice Station, Ananthapur District, State of Andhra Pradesh, within aperiod of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, theStation House Officer, Rapthadu Police station, shall release thepetitioners/ Nos,1, 3, 4 5, 7 and 11 on bail on their executing personalbond for a sum of Rs.1O,OOO/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with twosureties in a like sum each to his satisfaction. On such release, thepetitioners/accused Nos.1, 3, 4 5,7 and 11 shall. report before the StationHouse Officer, Rapthadu Police station, Ananthapur District, on everySunday between O9:OO AM and 10:OO AM, till filing of the charge-sheet.The petitioners/ accused Nos.l, 3, 4 5, 7 and 11 shall also abide by theconditions stipulated in Section 438 (2) of the code, and shall cooperatewith the investigating officer in the investigation of the case.
5, The Criminal Petitions pre, accordingly, allowed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Criminal Petitions shall stand closed.
llISdI B.SATYAASSISTA[T][ llli]STIIARFoT ASSISTAEGISTRAR
//TRUE [COPY//]
To,
The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapuramu
The Station House Officer, Rapthadu Pollce Station, Ananthapur District
Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (AP), High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)One CC to SRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Advocate [OPUC]One CC to SRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to SRI C SHARAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC][OPUC]
One spare copy
HIGH COURT
DR.SA]
DATED:28 /L2/zOLa
ORDER
CRLP NOS: 13615 & 13645 OF 2018
BAIL
Q-t-\ 1r