Telangana High Court
WP/46707/2022 of S. Jyothi Laxmi Vs The Director-General of Police on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ,, (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,IHE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E,V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 46707 OF 2022 Between: S. Jyothi Laxmi, Wo Sri G. Venkat Aged 43 years, Occ: Assistant
[ [32es ]]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA [,,](Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,IHE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E,V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 46707 OF 2022
Between:
S. Jyothi Laxmi, Wo Sri G. Venkat Aged 43 years, Occ: AssistantCommissioner of Police (CCS), Hyderabad City Commissionerate HyderabadCommissioner of Police (CCS), Hyderabad City Commissionerate Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Director-General of Police, State of Telangana DGP Office Complex,Lakdi-ka-pool, HyderabadLakdi-ka-pool, Hyderabad
2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government HomeDepartment, Secretariat Building Hyderabad - 500 001Department, Secretariat Building Hyderabad - 500 001
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of awrit of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia,
(i) declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in not including the name ofthe Petitioner in the Provisional Seniority List of Deputy Superintendentsof Police between 02.06.2014 to 31.08.2021 issued in proceedingsRc.No.192/G3/2O22, daled 25.11.2022 by the 1st Respondent and notconsidering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Addl.SP against the vacancy earrnarked for ST (Women) under Rules 22, rcadwith Rule 22-A of the Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rulesand considering the case of ST (Men) against such vacancy is arbitrary,illegal, discriminatory, malafide, u nconstitutional, violating Articles 14, 1621 of the Constitution of lndia apart from contrary to Rules 22, 22-A 33 ofTelangana State and Subordinate Service Rules.the Petitioner in the Provisional Seniority List of Deputy Superintendentsof Police between 02.06.2014 to 31.08.2021 issued in proceedingsRc.No.192/G3/2O22, daled 25.11.2022 by the 1st Respondent and notconsidering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Addl.SP against the vacancy earrnarked for ST (Women) under Rules 22, rcadwith Rule 22-A of the Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rulesand considering the case of ST (Men) against such vacancy is arbitrary,illegal, discriminatory, malafide, u nconstitutional, violating Articles 14, 1621 of the Constitution of lndia apart from contrary to Rules 22, 22-A 33 ofTelangana State and Subordinate Service Rules.
(ii) and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents forthwithconsider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Addl.consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Addl.
o
consideri 1g the case of the petitioner fttr [prtt:r ][Lotion ]despiteavailabili y o[ vacancy for ST (Women) antl also submitsthat the representation dated 29.71.2022 rnade by thepetitioner is also not considered and i1' is s::ll pending forconsidera.ion. But, in the meanwhile thr; s,t:rriority list isberng pre ozrred and the petitioner is not :o nsidered forunknown reasons.
3. On lhe other hand, learned Specia GovernmentPleader sr bmits that the seniority list has z; Iready beenissued by the respondents and the case cf tl Le cetitionerdoes not s.and within the merit list and ther:llrre the caseof the petitioner is not considered and further submits thatthe repre;entation dated 29.I1.2O2t1 ma.cle by thepetitioner vill be considered in accordanr:e with law.4. In vi:w of the submissions meide 1>1' both thecounsels, tl ris Court is inclined to direct the respondents toconsider t 1e representation of the petiticrner dated29.L1.2O22 in accordance with law, as expt:clitic,usly aspossible, pr:ferably, rvithin four (04) weeks frorn thr: date of
receipt of a copy of this order, taling into consideration ofher earlier date of promotion and strictly in adherence withthe rules prevailing as on today.her earlier date of promotion and strictly in adherence withthe rules prevailing as on today.
5Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
6. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writInterlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writpetition, shall s@nd closed.
Sdi. T. SRIASDEPUTY REGIRARSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Director-General of Police, DGP Office Complex, Lakdi-ka-pool, State ofTelangana, HyderabadTelangana, Hyderabad
2. The Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, SecretariatBuilding ,State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500 01Building ,State of Telangana, Hyderabad - 500 01
3. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES l, High Court for the State of Telangana, atHyderabad[OUT]Hyderabad[OUT]
4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, atHyderabad[OUT]Hyderabad[OUT]
5. One CC to SRl. P. V. KRISHNAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]6. One CC to SRl. M.V. RAIMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]7. Two CD copies6. One CC to SRl. M.V. RAIMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]7. Two CD copies BM
HIGH COUITTEW,JDATED:3011212022
tE-uArVe,or.,${ilw+Lo\=ORDER't,-)o:r\'J-\/tWP.No.467 )7 of 2022oot- DISPOSIN(IOF THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT ]OSTS
\[O]\f\[v']b[\,2]