Telangana High Court
CRLP/11027/2009 of Mudaraka Babu Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 31 December 2009
SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11027 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners – accused Nos.2 to 4 seeking to quash the order of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) at Parvathipuram in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.11027 OF 2009ORDER:
This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by thepetitioners – accused Nos.2 to 4 seeking to quash the order of thelearned II Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) atParvathipuram in Crl.M.P.No.66 of 2009 dated 10.12.2009, to theextent of curtailing the right of the defence to adduce its evidence andrestricting the further cross-examination of witnesses P.Ws.2,3 and 18.
2. Heard.
3. There is some ambiguity in the impugned order, as it says…
“------------------ the petitioners – Accused Nos. 2 to 4, to recallP.Ws.2,3 and 18 for the purpose of further cross-examination, asprayed for by them, on certain aspect only.”
4. As such, it is clarified that the cross-examination shall be onlyon the aspects referred in the petition Crl.M.P.No.66 of 2009 and noton any other aspect.
of.
5. With the above clarification, the Criminal Petition is disposed 31[st] December 2009Rns ___________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.10561 OF 2009ORDER:
This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed seekingto modify the orders dated 27.11.2009 passed by the I AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1011 of 2009in C.C.No.6 of 2002 and permit the petitioner – accused No.88 to leavethe country for a period of eight months from the last week of January,2010 to last week of September, 2010 for pilgrimage on foot byreducing the condition of security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The petitioner wants to go for pilgrimage by foot. As such,time granted by the Court below till February 2010 may not besufficient. Hence, the time granted vide orders dated 27.11.2009 bythe learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad isextended till the end of September 2010. Other conditions imposed bythe learned Sessions Judge, shall remain unaltered.
5. The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed.
16[th] December 2009Rns
___________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.