Telangana High Court
CC/1211/2003 of D. Jayalaxmi Vs Mr. Rajeshwar Tiwari on 22 December 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1211 of 2003 (Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents in violating
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND THREE
: PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDYCONTEMPT CASE No.1211 of 2003
(Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 topunish the respondents in violating the orders passed in WP. MP. No.25560 of 2003 in W.P. No. 20420 of 2003 dated: 25-09-2003)
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1211 of 2003
Between:
1. D. Jayalaxmi.2. K. Lakshmi Bai.3. K. Suneetha.
4. K. Mallamma.5. J. Yeshoda.6. B. Padma.7. S. Yadamma.8. N. Mallaiah.9. V. Narender.10. S. Laxmi.11. D. Murali.
12. N. Narasamma.13. K. Anjaliamma.14. A. Yadagiri.
15. A. Parvathamma..(All are residents of Gandhi Colony, Scheduled Case & BackwardClasses, Behind Y.W.C.A. Picket, Secunderabad)
.. Petitioners
AND
1. Mr. Rajeshwari Tiwari, The District Collector, Hyderabad District, atHyderabad.
2. Mr. Venkateswar Reddy, The District Manager, Housing Cell, DistrictCollectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad.Collectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad.
.. Respondents
The Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the case and theaffidavit filed herein and the order of the High Court dated: 15-10-2003 andmade herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Jagadish ChandraPrasad, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr. V. Ch. Naidu, Advocate for therespondent No. 2, the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“In view of the facts stated in the counter affidavit filed by respondentNo. 2, the order dated: 15-10-2003 is modified to the extent that it shallbe open to the respondents to proceed with the construction in respectof beneficiaries who have already given consent for the reduction of theextent.
Post on 15-12-2003”.
DEPUTY
REGISTRAR
// True copy//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. Mr. Rajeshwari Tiwari, The District Collector, Hyderabad District, atHyderabad.Hyderabad.
2. Mr. Venkateswar Reddy, The District Manager, Housing Cell, DistrictCollectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. (1 & 2BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy of petition and affidavit)Collectorate’s Office, Nampally Station Road, Hyderabad. (1 & 2BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy of petition and affidavit)3. One spare copy.
Ksv
KsvDate of drafting: 10-12-2003
HIGH COURT
LNRJ
DATE: 08-12-2003
NOTE: POST ON 15-12-2003
C.C. NO. 1211 OF 2003