Telangana High Court
CC/1580/2011 of Narayanasetti Sangameswara Rao Vs Sri P.V.Ramalingeswar, on 29 December 2011
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1580 of 2011 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent did not implement the orders, dated 05.12.2009, passed by this Court in W.P.No.26588 of 2009. It is in relation to the allotment of a shop by Srikakulam Municipality.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYCONTEMPT CASE No.1580 of 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent didnot implement the orders, dated 05.12.2009, passed by this Courtin W.P.No.26588 of 2009. It is in relation to the allotment of ashop by Srikakulam Municipality.
The respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that thepetitioner was not the original lessee and in the context ofallotment of shops, the matter is pending adjudication inW.A.No.1354 of 2009.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel for the respondents.
The Municipality constructed new shops by demolishing oldones. The petitioner was a sub-lessee in respect of one of thedemolished shops. This Court declined to recognize him as aperson entitled to be allotted new shop. However, a direction wasissued to the effect that in case the Municipality conducts auctionin respect of allotment of the shops, the case of the petitioner shallalso be considered. It is not the version of the petitioner that anyauction was conducted, much less his bid was rejected. At anyrate, the matter is pending adjudication before the Division Bench.
Hence, the contempt case is closed. It shall be open to thepetitioner to work out his remedies depending on the outcome ofthe writ appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J