Telangana High Court
WP/22045/2003 of THE COMMISSIONER AND DIR.OF MARKETING AND 2 OTHERS Vs M.ASHOK AND ANTOHER on 31 December 2019
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.22045 of 2003 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners had contended that the Labour Court had mechanically passed the order dated 25.07.2003 in MP.No.52 of 2000 directing the petitioners herein to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.22045 of 2003
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners had contended that the Labour Court had mechanically passed the order dated 25.07.2003 in MP.No.52 of 2000 directing the petitioners herein to pay an amount of Rs.1,46,674-20 ps to the 1[st] respondent herein. Government Pleader further contended that on 21.10.2003, this Court was pleased to grant interim suspension of the impugned order subject to the condition that the petitioners deposit half of the amount awarded by the Labour Court, and in pursuance of the interim orders dated 21.10.2003, the petitioners have deposited 50% of the amount determined by the Labour Court. Government Pleader had further contended that the Labour Court has mechanically passed the impugned order in favour of the 1[st]respondent without looking into the calculation sheet filed by the petitioners.
This Court, having considered the above submissions, is of the considered view that the petitioners have not filed the calculation sheet, which was filed before the Labour Court, as a material paper before this Court, and in the absence of the same, this Court cannot adjudicate the case on merits and appreciate the contention of the Government Pleader that the calculation sheet was not considered by the Labour Court. A perusal of the impugned order passed by the Labour Court clearly shows that the Labour Court has considered the case of the petitioners and, after examining the case thoroughly, allowed the MP in favour of the 1[st] respondent – workman. Government Pleader could not point out any grave irregularity or illegality in the impugned order passed by the Labour Court, so as to interfere with the same. Moreover, the petitioners have already paid half of the amount determined by the Labour Court to the 1[st]respondent and the only issue is about payment of balance 50% of the amount. Considering all these aspects and also the fact that this is a long pending case, in order to give quietus to this litigation, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
31-12-2019 v v
______________________________
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J