Telangana High Court
WP/25308/1997 of J.MALLA REDDY Vs RTA BY SECTY NELLORE ANDANOTHER on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 25308 of 1997 Between: J.Mallareddy, S/o.Malakondareddy, Bus owner, Nellore. .....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 25308 of 1997
Between:
J.Mallareddy, S/o.Malakondareddy,
Bus owner, Nellore.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1. Regional Transport Authority,rep. By Secretary, Nellore.
2. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, declaring the action ofthe respondents in not considering the applications of the petitioners for the grant ofpucca as well as temporary permits for variation of his existing routes Gangavaramto Atmakur Bus stand as Rebala Main road to Atmakur Bus Stand andButhireddypalem Koncetimitta to Damaramaddugu as Buchireddipalem Konetimettato Venkateswarapuram as illegal and arbitrary and further direct the respondents toconsider and dispose of the said applications forthwith.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.RAJAGOPALA CHARYCounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. P.Raja Gopala Chary,that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as tocosts. Interim order granted earlier shall stand dissolved.
__________
To
1. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore.
2. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore.
3. Two CCs to the G.P for Transport, High Court Buildings,Hyderabad(O.U.T).
4. 2CD copies