Telangana High Court

WA/2042/2004 of K. Venu Gopal Rao, Vs The Managing Director, on 30 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2042 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE

and

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY

WRIT APPEAL NO : 2042 of 2004

(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated02/11/2004 in WP NO : 18025 OF 1996 on the file of the High Court.)

Between:

K. Venu Gopal Rao, S/o. Late Sanyasi Naidu,R/o. Main Road, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.

..... APPELLANT

AND

1 The Managing Director, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Visakhpatnam. Visakhpatnam.

2 The Divisional Manager, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District. Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.

3 The Branch Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Ltd., Seethammapet, Srikakulam District. Seethammapet, Srikakulam District.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Appellant: MR.S.R.SANKU

Counsel for the Respondents: MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY

The Court made the following :

ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice)

We do not find any ground to interfere with the order of learned single Judgedismissing the writ petition wherein prayer made by the petitioner was for a directionto the respondents to absorb him as a van driver in the 3[rd] respondent corporation. Itwas found that the petitioner was not continuously working and he has no right to beregularized.

Appeal dismissed.

___________________

DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ

30-12-2004

_____________________

M.NARAYANA REDDY, J

tvr

To

1 The Managing Director, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Visakhpatnam. Visakhpatnam.

2 The Divisional Manager, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District. Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.

3 The Branch Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Ltd., Seethammapet, Srikakulam District. Seethammapet, Srikakulam District.

4 2 CD copies.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead