Telangana High Court
WA/2042/2004 of K. Venu Gopal Rao, Vs The Managing Director, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2042 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2042 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated02/11/2004 in WP NO : 18025 OF 1996 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
K. Venu Gopal Rao, S/o. Late Sanyasi Naidu,R/o. Main Road, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 The Managing Director, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Visakhpatnam. Visakhpatnam.
2 The Divisional Manager, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District. Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.
3 The Branch Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Ltd., Seethammapet, Srikakulam District. Seethammapet, Srikakulam District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant: MR.S.R.SANKU
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.N.SRIDHAR REDDY
The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice)
We do not find any ground to interfere with the order of learned single Judgedismissing the writ petition wherein prayer made by the petitioner was for a directionto the respondents to absorb him as a van driver in the 3[rd] respondent corporation. Itwas found that the petitioner was not continuously working and he has no right to beregularized.
Appeal dismissed.
___________________
DEVINDER GUPTA, CJ
30-12-2004
_____________________
M.NARAYANA REDDY, J
tvr
To
1 The Managing Director, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Visakhpatnam. Visakhpatnam.
2 The Divisional Manager, Girijan Cooperative Corporation Limited, Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District. Seethammapeta, Srikakulam District.
3 The Branch Manager, Girijan Primary Cooperative Marketing Ltd., Seethammapet, Srikakulam District. Seethammapet, Srikakulam District.
4 2 CD copies.