Telangana High Court
WP/24496/2020 of T. Punnam Chander Vs State of Telangana on 30 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No: 24496 0F 2020 1 2 T. Punnam Chander, S/o. T. Venkat Reddy, aged 41 years, Occ: A.E.O,
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No: 24496 0F 2020
Between:
1T. Punnam Chander, S/o. T. Venkat Reddy, aged 41 years, Occ: A.E.O,Timmapur (HQ and I\,4 ). Karrmnagar Djstrict .2N. Bharat Kumar, Sio. N Rudraiah, aged 30 years, Occ: A.E.O, Vaddlur_Begumpet (HQ). Bejjanki (lV), Siddipet Disirict...PETITIONERSTimmapur (HQ and I\,4 ). Karrmnagar Djstrict .2N. Bharat Kumar, Sio. N Rudraiah, aged 30 years, Occ: A.E.O, Vaddlur_Begumpet (HQ). Bejjanki (lV), Siddipet Disirict...PETITIONERS
AND
'l . State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Agri. and Coop) Dept.,Secretariat, Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of Agriculture, Telanoana, Hvderabad.3. The Joint Director of Agiiculture, Xarimnigai, [' ][- ][-]Secretariat, Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of Agriculture, Telanoana, Hvderabad.3. The Joint Director of Agiiculture, Xarimnigai, [' ][- ][-]
4. The Registrar. Prof. Jayashankar Telanag-ana State Agriculture University,Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad.Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toissue a writ of lvlandamus, by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in notconsidering the petitioners for B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture course, as per theMemo.No.2584lExamsl2020, dtd. 0311212020 of the 2nd respondent and alsoignoring the seniority as per the order in O.A.No.146212013, dtd. 23.02.2013, andfurther action of the 2nd respondent in issuing letter No.A6(2)26s12020, dld.28-12-2020, by nol including the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation ofArts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2ndrespondent to consider the representation dtd. 28.12.2020, submitted by thepetitioners.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners daled 28-12-2020 asper the l\,4emo. No.2584lExams/2020, dtd. 03.12.2020.Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K.L.N. RAGHAVENORA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - lll The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ [petition ]is being disposed of ol [the ][odmission stoge]wilh the consent of bolh [porlies.]
This wril [pelition ]is filed seeking the following [relief ][:]
"...... to issue a writ of Mandamus by declaring the action ofthe 2nd respondent in not considering the [petitioners ][for]B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture course, as per Memo No.2584 t Exams 17020 dated 03/1212020 of the 2nd respondentand atso ignoring the seniority as per the order in 0.A.No.1462t2013, dtd 23.07.2013 and further action of the [2"d]respondent in issuing letter No. A6(2 )265/2020dtd.28/12/2020, by not inctuding the [petitioners, ]asittegat, arbitrary, unjust and in vio(ation of Arts. 14 and 16of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2'drespondent to consider the representation dtd 28.12.2020submitted by the petitioners ...... ".the 2nd respondent in not considering the [petitioners ][for]B.Sc. (Hons.) Agriculture course, as per Memo No.2584 t Exams 17020 dated 03/1212020 of the 2nd respondentand atso ignoring the seniority as per the order in 0.A.No.1462t2013, dtd 23.07.2013 and further action of the [2"d]respondent in issuing letter No. A6(2 )265/2020dtd.28/12/2020, by not inctuding the [petitioners, ]asittegat, arbitrary, unjust and in vio(ation of Arts. 14 and 16of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2'drespondent to consider the representation dtd 28.12.2020submitted by the petitioners ...... ".
Heord Sri K.L.N.Roghovendro Reddy, leorned counseloppeoring for the [petitioners ]ond the leorned Government Pleoderfor Services-lll oppeoring for the respondents.
It hos been contended by the [petitioners ]thot they oreworking os Agriculture Extension Officers ond they ore eligible forfurlher studies i.e., B.Sc. (Hons./Agriculture). While so, theGovernmenl hos issued G.O.Rt.No.l112 doted 27.09.2017 occordingpermission lo the Commissioner of Agriculture, Hyderobod tosponsor the condidotes from in-service Agriculture Extension Officersto pursue B.Sc. (Hons./Agriculture) course ond their nomes wereincluded in lhe list published on 03.12.2020 for pursuing furtherstudies i.e., B.Sc. (Hons./Agriculture). However, wilhoul ossigningony reosons, their nomes were deleled vide proceedings dote.1
28.12.2Q20. Aggrieved by the some, lhey hove submiltedrepresentotion to the respondents on 28.12.2020. But, so for, therespondents hove not possed ony orders on the soid represeniotion.
Therefore, leorned counsel oppeoring for the petilionercontended thot oppropriote orders be possed in ihe writ pelitiondirecting the respondents to consider lhe representotion submiitedcontended thot oppropriote orders be possed in ihe writ pelitiondirecting the respondents to consider lhe representotion submiitedby the petitioners on 28.)2.202Q ond poss opproprioie orders inoccordonce with low.occordonce with low.
Leorned Government Pleoder oppeoring for the respondentsconiended thol since lhe petitioner's represeniotion is pending wilhthe respondenls, the respondents would consider the some ondconiended thol since lhe petitioner's represeniotion is pending wilhthe respondenls, the respondents would consider the some ondposs oppropriote orders in occordonce wilh low.
This Court, hoving considered ihe rivol submissions mode bythe porties, is of the considered view thot ihis writ pelition con bethe porties, is of the considered view thot ihis writ pelition con bedisposed of direcling the respondents to consider therepresenlotion submitted by the pelitioners on 28.12.2020 ond possoppropriole orders in occordonce wilh low, wilhin o reosonobleperiod of lime, preferobly within o period of eight weeks from thedote of receipl of o copy of ihis order.period of lime, preferobly within o period of eight weeks from thedote of receipl of o copy of ihis order.
Wllh the obove observolions, this writ petition is disposed of.No costs.
Pending miscelloneous petilions, if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/.K.SAILESHIASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// TYiISTRARsEcTloN oFFIGER
To,
1. T.he Principal Secretary, (Agri. and Coop) Dept., State of Telangana, Secretariat,HyderabadHyderabad
2. The Commissioner of Agriculture, Telanqana, Hyderabad.
3. The Joint Director of Agriculture, Karimn-aqar, Karimn-aqar,4. The Regislrar, Prof . Jayashankar Telanag-ana State Agriculture University,Rajendra Nagar. Hyderabad.Rajendra Nagar. Hyderabad.
5. One CC to Sri K.L.N. Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl6. Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court for the Stat-e of Teiangana atHyderabad. [OUT]6. Two CCs to GP for Services-ll, High Court for the Stat-e of Teiangana atHyderabad. [OUT]7. Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. [OUT]Hyderabad. [OUT]
[OUT]8. One CC to Sri T. Thimmoti, SC FOR Telangana State Agriculture UnivbrsityloPUClloPUCl
9. Two CD Copies
CHR":<
HIGH COURTDATED:3011212020
ORDERW.P.No.24496 of 2020
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONAT THE STAGE OF ADMISSIONWITHOUT COSTS
<>
HEs74oi0 6 JAN 2021't*t,17