Telangana High Court
WP/34508/2011 of A. Satyanarayana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 December 2011
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WP. NO:34508 of 2011 Between: A . Satyanarayana, S/o Swamy, ..... Petitioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABADWEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMEDANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWP. NO:34508 of 2011
Between:
A. Satyanarayana, S/o Swamy,
AND
..... Petitioner
1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, rep. by the Principal Secretary, 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Kukatpally, Hyderabad.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and theaffidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ ofHabeas Corpus or any other appropriate order or direction in thenature of a writ directing the respondents herein to produce the son ofthe petitioner A.Shekar, Aged 26 years, and parents of his daughter-in-law, R.Pentaiah, aged about 61 years, and Smt.R.Shantamma,aged 50 years before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty afterdeclaring the action of the police in taking them into unlawfully intocustody and subjecting them to physical torture as illegal, arbitrary,discriminatory and violative under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitutionof India, and also as being without jurisdiction null and void in theinterest of justice; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing thePetition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri K.S.Rahul, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the AdvocateGeneral for the Respondents, the Court made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“Heard.
The 2[nd] respondent is directed to produce A. Shekar bytomorrow at 2.15 p.m. i.e, 29-12-2011 before this Court.”
To
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Department ofHome, Secretariat, Saifabad, HyderabadHome, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2 The Station House Officer, P.S. Kukatpally, Hyderabad. (BY SPL.MESSENGER)MESSENGER)
3. Two CCs to Advocate General, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)(OUT)
4. One CC to K.S. Rahul, Advocate (OPUC)
5. Two Spare Copies
ABDRAFTED ON 28-12-2011
HIGH COURT
GMJ&NRRJ
DATE: 28-12-2011
NOTE: POST ON 29-12-2011
ORDER
WP. NO. 34508 OF 2011