Telangana High Court
WP/17526/2014 of Church Educational Society, Vs All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17526 OF 2014 Between: 1. Church Educational Society, G-2, SBI Colony, Bagh
I
I
I
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 17526 OF 2014
Between:
1. Church Educational Society, G-2, SBI Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad -500 013. Rep. by its Chairman, lvlr. N. Raja Babu.500 013. Rep. by its Chairman, lvlr. N. Raja Babu.
2. Aurora's Design lnstitute, Uppal, Ghatkesar, Ranga Reddy - 500 039. Rep. byits Chairman, Mr. N. Raja Babu.its Chairman, Mr. N. Raja Babu.
3. N. Raja Babu, S/o. Late Seethaiah, Aged about 51 years, F/o. G2, SBIColony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad - 500 01 3.Colony, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad - 500 01 3.
...PETITIONERS
AND
IAll lndia Council for Technical Education (AICTE), 7th Floor, ChandralokBuilding, Janpath, New Delhi - 110002, Rep. by its Secretary.Building, Janpath, New Delhi - 110002, Rep. by its Secretary.
2Govemment of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Department ofHigher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constrtution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue any Writ, order or direction. more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus declaring the actron of the 1 st Respondent in not [granting]approval to the [petitioners ]for conducting Post Graduate Courses in Architecturein the 2nd Petitioner lnstitution as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutiona I and directthe 1st Respondent to grant approval to the 2nd Petitioner lnstitution to conductPost Graduate courses in Architecture.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 21931 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the I st Respondent to process the Petitioners' application for grantingapproval to the rd Petitioner lnstitution for conducting Post Graduate Courses inArchitecture and pass further order or orders thereon.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased todirect the I st Respondent to process the Petitioners' application for grantingapproval to the rd Petitioner lnstitution for conducting Post Graduate Courses inArchitecture and pass further order or orders thereon.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RUSHEEK REDDY.K.V
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI MEHBOOB ALl, SC FOR AICTECounsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
\
I
/
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDAWRIT PETITION0.17526 of 2OL4
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf ofpetitioners and Mr.Mehboob Ali, !earned StandingCounsel for AICTE appearing on behalf of respondentNo.1.
PERUSED THE RECORD.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking [prayer ]asu nder:
"to issue any Writ, order or direction, moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the 1't Respondent in notgranting approval to the petitioners for conductingPost Graduate Courses in Architecture in the 2ndPetitioner Institution as illegal, arbitrary andu nconstitutiona I and direct the 1't Respondent togrant approval to the 2nd Petitioner Institution toconduct Post Graduate courses in Architecture andpass such other order or orders as this Hon'bleCourt may deem fit and proper in thecircumstances of the case. ["]
3. It is represented by Mr.Mehboob Ali, Iearned StandingCounsel for AICTE, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1that, the cause of action in the present Writ petition does notsurvive for adjudication anymore because the grievance of the To, ft
petitioner pertaining to the consideration of the petitioner'sapplication seeking approval for conducting Post GraduateCourses in Architecture in the 2nd [petitioner's ]institution forthe Academic Year 2014-15 had been considered.application seeking approval for conducting Post GraduateCourses in Architecture in the 2nd [petitioner's ]institution forthe Academic Year 2014-15 had been considered.
4. Bringing the said submission of learned StandingCounsel for AICTE for respondent No.1 on record, theWrit Petitaon is dismissed as infructuous. However,there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendingin the Writ Petition shall also stand dismissed.AssrsrASP6!c:3+ST//TRUE COPY// \SECTION OFFICERin the Writ Petition shall also stand dismissed.AssrsrASP6!c:3+ST//TRUE COPY// \SECTION OFFICER
One CC to SRI [RUSHEEK REDDY.K.V, ][Advocate' ][[OPUC]]iil [-ct;t" ]bij-r--on [HtcnER ][EDUCATIoN, High ][court ][for ][the ][State ][of]Telanoana at HYderabad. [OUTIo;;'ic i; snr'rvrEtiaooB [ALl, ][sc ][FoR ][AlcrE. ][[oPUC]]Two CD [CoPies.]BSKGJP
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
WP.No.17526 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS !NFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS
t$oL--b1"s"6t'/CIAL
"( HE [STA]oO[ 5 FiA 202tO>,a,./)a/'