Telangana High Court
CC/2069/2013 of T. Satyanarayana, Vs Sri N.Venkateshwara Rao, on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR Contempt Case No.2069 of 2013 ORDER: Sri Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned standing counsel for APSRTC submitted that having regard to the orders of the Hon’ble High Court dated 13.06.2013 in W.P. No.16616 of 2013, the 1st respondent has complied the same by
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Contempt Case No.2069 of 2013
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Sunil Kumar Reddy, learned standing counsel for APSRTCsubmitted that having regard to the orders of the Hon’ble High Court dated13.06.2013 in W.P. No.16616 of 2013, the 1[st] respondent has compliedthe same by issuing the proceedings No.L4/785(66)/2013-GHZ, dated27.09.2013. However, learned standing counsel for petitioner submits thatthere are other posts such as attender, stores assistant etc., admittedly thepetitioner’s leg was amputed and it is visible to the naked eye that hecannot be in a position to work as Shramik.
In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to make arepresentation to the respondent and the respondent shall examine hiscase sympathetically and pass appropriate orders. Subject to theobservation made supra, the Contempt Proceedings are closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shallstand closed.
__________________
B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J
30[th] December, 2013knlknl