CRP/947/2014 of AMZAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERS Vs ARVIND KUMAR GOEL AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2020

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 947 OF 2014

(Petition Under Article 227 o'f the Constitution of lndia against the orders dated29.11.2013 made in 1.A.No.981 of 2012 in O.S.No.408 of 2009 on the file of the Court ofthe Vlll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar)Between:

1 . Amzad Khan S/o, Vazir Khan Rio.Kacharam Village H.No. 1-67 Shamshabadtr/andal R.R.District.tr/andal R.R.District.

2. Himed Khan, S/o. Vazir Khan R/o. Kacharam Village H.No. 1-67 Shamshabadl\/andai R.R.District.l\/andai R.R.District.

3. Urmath Khan, S/o. Vazir Khan Rl/o. Kacharam Village H.No. 1-67 ShamshabadMandal R.R.District.Mandal R.R.District.4. Azmalh Khan, S/o. Vazir Khan Rl/o. Kacharam Village H.No. 1-67 ShamshabadMandal R.R.District....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5Mandal R.R.District....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5

AND

1. Arvind Kumar Goel S/o- Late Surender Kumar Goel R/o. Flat No. 401 SaiPragathi Towers, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad - 500 029Pragathi Towers, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad - 500 029

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF2. \Ar. Yazir Khan, S/o. Burhan Khan Fi./o. Kacharam Village H.No. [1-67]Shamshabad Mandal R.R.District(Respondent No.2 is not necessary party to this CRP)...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT NO,1Shamshabad Mandal R.R.District(Respondent No.2 is not necessary party to this CRP)...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT NO,1

C.R.P.M.P.NO: 1307 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances [stated ][in the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court [may ][be ][pleased ][to ][stay ][all]further [proceedings ]in OS No. 408 of 2009 on the [file of VIll ][Additional District ][&]Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.nagar [pending disposal of ][the ][CRP.\]

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. VIKHAR [AHMED]

Counsel for the Respondents : --

The Court made the following: ORDER

IIOYI}I-E.IUS'I'ICE [G. ][SRI ][DE\ ][t]

( t\ It. T{E\ ISIO\ Pl.- t'l-l'lo\\[o.91'7][ of ][201l]

ORDI-R :

'fhis revision petition is tlled challenging the order [dated]29.11.2013, [passed ][by ][the ][VIll-Additional District and ][Sessions]Judge, Ranga [Rcddy, in ][I.A.No'981 ][of ][2012 ][in O'S'No'408 of ][2009']29.11.2013, [passed ][by ][the ][VIll-Additional District and ][Sessions]Judge, Ranga [Rcddy, in ][I.A.No'981 ][of ][2012 ][in O'S'No'408 of ][2009']

When the matter [is ][taken ][up, ][it ][is ][brought ][to ][the notice ][of ][this]court that o.S.No.408 [of ][2009 ][itself ][has been ][disposed ][of ][by the ][trial]Cout.ton21.o3,2ol1,Inviewofthesame,nothingstrrvivestbradjudicatiorr [in this revision petition']

'l'he Civil Revision Petition is accoldingly dismissed asinfiuctr,tous. No [order ][as ][to ][costs.]

Consequently, [pencling ][miscellaneous ][applications' ][if ][an1' shall]

t'^t33["[ff*H*i I,rRUEcoPY/, Reddv [District at ][L B ][Nagar]

stancl closcd.

To123, ffisiHitrl,f$?i..?J'xA"*s:i:33ii,ji3tf,3i"ga kSONz HIGH COURT

GSD,J

DATED:3011212020

1tlt5TA )'4i+c12 JAil [2021]* !)r:Pa.