Telangana High Court
WP/24855/2004 of Syed Jellani, Vs The Station House Officer, on 30 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 24855 of 2004 Between: Syed Jellani, S/o. Late Syed Meer, R/o. 21-4-685, Gulab
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 24855 of 2004
Between:
Syed Jellani, S/o. Late Syed Meer,
R/o. 21-4-685, Gulab Singh Bowli, Petla Burj, Hyderabad.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Station House Officer, Kalapattar P.S., Kalapattar, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto Issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the in action of the 1st respondent on my application dt. 13.12.2004 ingranting police protection to the petitioner’s property bearing No. 19-2-156/25/1ad-measuring 305 sq. yards situated at Tadban, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad isnull and void consequently direct the Ist respondent to give police protection tothe petitioners property.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.V.H.V.R.R.SWAMYCounsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HOME
The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER:
Petitioner seeks a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondent inaccording protection to his property though an order of temporary injunctionwas granted in O.S.No.7719 of 2003 on the file of the VIII Junior Civil Judge,City Civil Courts, Hyderabad is illegal and arbitrary and seeks necessarydirections.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader forHome.
It is not in dispute that the petitioner had obtained an order of temporaryinjunction. If the injunction is violated by the defendants in the suit, twocourses, namely to file an application under Rule 2A of Order 39 C.P.C. or tofile an application for grant of police aid, are open to the petitioner. It is onlywhen the trial Court passes an order granting police aid and it is notimplemented that the petitioner can file a writ petition. Admittedly, the petitionerhad not filed any such application before the trial Court.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file anapplication before the trial Court for granting police aid. There shall be no order as to costs.
-----------------------
30.12.2004
Note:
Issue CC in three days.
(BO)
ksld
To
1 The Station House Officer, Kalapattar P.S., Kalapattar, Hyderabad.
2 Two C.Cs. to the Government Pleader for Home, High Court Buildings, A.P.,Hyderabad, (OUT).Hyderabad, (OUT).
3 Two C.D. Copies.