Telangana High Court

WP/7791/2003 of COUNTRY CLUB LTD HYDAND2 ORS Vs SECRY MINISTRY OF LAW NEW DELHIANDANR on 31 December 2004

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 7791 of 2003 Between: 1.. M/s.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,THE CHIEF JUSTICE

and

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.NARAYANA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO : 7791 of 2003

Between:

1.. M/s. Country Club (I) Limited,

having its Registered office at 5-9-16,

Amrutha Castle, Opp: Secretariat,

Hyderabad

Rep by its Managing Director Y.Rajeev Reddy

2.. Amrutha Estates, a partnership firm

having its office at 8-2-703,

Amrutha Valley, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Rep by its Managing Partner Y.Rajeev Reddy

3.. Amrutha Estates Private Limited,

having its Registered office at 8-2-703, Amrutha Valley, Road No. 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Rep by its Managing Director, Y.Rajeev Reddy

AND

1.. Union of India,

represented by its Secretary,

Ministry of Law, Shastri Bhavan,

Page 1 of 3

R.P.Road, New Delhi

2.. The Prudential Cooperative Bank Limited having its Registered office at 8-1-381

R.P.Road, Secunderabad,

Rep by its Authorised Officer/Assistant General Manager

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, order or direction, declaring TheSecuritisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of SecurityInterest Act, 2002, more particularly sections 13, 15 & 34 thereof, as beingunconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 , 19 (1)(g) and 300-A ofthe Constitution of India and consequently quash the notice dated 22-4-2003 issuedin Ref.No.PCB/RP/AR/ESI/329/03-04 /EM2541 on the file of the 2[nd] respondent;award costs and pass such other or further orders as are deemed fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.RAGHUVEER REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY

Standing Counsel for Central Govt.

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MR.S.ASHOK ANAND KUMAR

The Court made the following :

W.P.No.7791 of 2003

HCJ, & MNR,J

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice)

In view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Case

Page 2 of 3

(Civil) No. 92-95 of 2002, dated 8[th] April, 2004 (MARDIA CHEMICALS LTD v.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS), challenge to the provisions of the Securitisationand Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002, is not tenable and for that reason, relief prayed for cannot be granted.

The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed.

________________________DEVINDER GUPTA, C.J._________________________M.NARAYANA REDDY, J

31-12-2004

bsc

..... REGISTRAR

To

1.. The Secretary,

Union of India,

Ministry of Law, Shastri Bhavan,

R.P.Road, New Delhi

2.. The Authorised Officer/Assistant General Manager The Prudential Cooperative Bank Limited having its Registered office at 8-1-381

R.P.Road, Secunderabad,

3. 2 CD copies

Form-NIC-OGS/WP{}

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead