Telangana High Court

WP/24271/2004 of N.P. Ch. Rao, Vs The APSRTC, Rep. by its Regional Manager, on 27 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION No. 24271 of 2004 Between: 1 N.P. Ch. Rao, S/o. Mastan Rao, Driver E-351450 Working at

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

WRIT PETITION No. 24271 of 2004

Between:

1 N.P. Ch. Rao, S/o. Mastan Rao, Driver E-351450

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

2 D.KI.P. Rao, S/o. Venkateswaralu, Driver E-401757

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

3 B.V.K. Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy, Driver E-352555

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

4 P. Daya Ratnam, S/o. Issak,Driver E-505349

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

5 Abdul Kaleem, S/o. Abdul Rahman,Driver E-352565

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

6 T.V. Ratnam, S/o. Ramana Rao,Driver E-352570

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

7 A.H. Prasad Babu, S/o. Rama Rao,Driver E-106777

Working at Guntur -II Depot , R/o. Guntur, Guntur District.

AND

..... PETITIONERS

1 The APSRTC, Rep. by its Regional Manager, Guntur Region, guntur.

2 The APSRTC, Rep. by its Depot Manager, Guntur -II, Guntur.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in theAffidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents herein in not granting the selectiongrade scale stagnation increment to the petitioners on completion of 12 years service is illegal, unjust andarbitrary, contrary to well established principles of law and as such set aside the same by directing therespondents herein to add the stagnation increment to all the petitioners on completion of 12 years of serviceirrespective of their transfer from the date of initial appointment and to pay the arrears by refixing the pay of allthe petitioners forthwith and to pass such other order or orders.

Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.M.SUBHAN

Counsel for the Respondents: MR.R.MANMADHA REDDY

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

In not granting the selection grade scale stagnation increment to thepetitioners on completion of 12 years service, the present writ petitionis filed.

The petitioners are working as Drivers in the respondent Corporation.They contend that after completion of 12 years of successful servicein the respective categories, they are entitled for Selection GradeStagnation increment, which has already remained due on differentdates.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents did nottake any steps to release the Special Grade Stagnation increment tothe petitioners; therefore, they approached this Court seekingdirection to the respondents to pass appropriate orders regarding theSelection Grade Stagnation increment to them. Respondents did notdeny the eligibility of the employees who have completed 12 years ofcontinuous service for the Selection Grade Stagnation increment.

3. In the light of the circumstances, the respondents are directed topass appropriate orders regarding the release of the Selection GradeScale Stagnation increment to the petitioners, keeping in view theJudgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1301 of2000 dated 29.10.2002, within a period of two months from the dateof receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to thepetitioners.

4. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs.

_________

dsr

To:

1. The Regional Manager, APSRTC,Guntur Region, Guntur

2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC,

Guntur-II, Guntur District

3. Two CD copies.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead