Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50093/2017 of AMANDEEP Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 29 December 2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.105 CRM-M-50093-2017 Date of decision : 29.12.2017 Amandeep ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL Present: Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-50093-2017 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Sr. No.105
CRM-M-50093-2017 |
Date of decision : 29.12.2017_... Petitioner Amandeep _
VERSUS.
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL
Present:Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocatefor the petitioner. —
FE FE
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he hassubmitted a representation dated 06.09.2017 regarding him having beendefrauded of Rs.10,00,000/- approximately by one Rakesh Kumar, S/o KakaRam and receipt of threats from the said person to withdraw complaint dated05.09.2017. It is also stated in the said representation that these personshave made him sign blank papers.|
Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. AbhaypalSingh Gill, AAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice onbehalf of State. Let three copies of the petition be supplied to him during thecourse of the day. |
Keeping in view the nature of allegations made and without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is deemed appropriate to disposeof the petition with direction to respondent No.3 to enquire into therepresentation (Annexure P-1), dated 06.09.2017 and take appropriate CRM-M-50093-2017 2
action, in accordance with law, in case, any cognizable offence is made out after the enquiry.
The petition is disposed of.(SUDHIR MITTAL)JUDGE|December 29, 2017Ramandeep SinghWhether speaking / reasonedYes/NoWhether ReportableYes/ No