Telangana High Court
WP/4340/2014 of CORSP AND SECY, CRESCENT ELE. TEACHER TRG IST., KARIMNAGAR Vs PRL SECY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT, HYDERABAD AND 4 OTHERS on 29 December 2023
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4340 OF 2014 Between: Crescent Elementary Teacher Training lnstitute (D.Ed.),
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 4340 OF 2014
Between:
Crescent Elementary Teacher Training lnstitute (D.Ed.), Karimnagar,Karimnagar District, rep. by its Correspondent and Secretary Sri M.A.Zahoor,S/o tvl.A.Gafoor, Aged about 49 years, R:/o Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, School EducationDepartment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Minorities WelfareDepartment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner & Director of School Education, Govt. of A.P., Saifabad,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
4. The Director, SCERT., State Council of Educational Research and Training,A.P., Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.A.P., Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
5. The Director of Government Examinations, Chapel Road, Nampally,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writof Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the list of theadmitted candidates of the petitioner institution to write 1st year D.Edexaminations for the academic year 2012-2013 vide RC.No.91N1-3/DIET/201 1,dt.26-1O-2O13 by the 3rd respondent, and conforming the same by the 1strespondent vide G.O.RI.No.33, dt. 17-01-2014 denying the relaxation given to theBC, ST, SC students, as illegal, arbitrary and Contrary to Rule 3(2)(b) of NCTENorms and Standards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher Education Programme,2009 and violation of Art.30(1 ) of the Constitution of lndia, 1950, consequentlydirect the respondents allow the students of the petitioner institution to write the1st year D.Ed examinations for the academic year 2012-2O13.of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in rejecting the list of theadmitted candidates of the petitioner institution to write 1st year D.Edexaminations for the academic year 2012-2013 vide RC.No.91N1-3/DIET/201 1,dt.26-1O-2O13 by the 3rd respondent, and conforming the same by the 1strespondent vide G.O.RI.No.33, dt. 17-01-2014 denying the relaxation given to theBC, ST, SC students, as illegal, arbitrary and Contrary to Rule 3(2)(b) of NCTENorms and Standards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher Education Programme,2009 and violation of Art.30(1 ) of the Constitution of lndia, 1950, consequentlydirect the respondents allow the students of the petitioner institution to write the1st year D.Ed examinations for the academic year 2012-2O13.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 5363 0F 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe respondents to allow the students of petitioner institution to write year D.Ed.,examinations for the academic year 2012-2013, by Suspending the proceedingsvide RC.No.9/N1-3/DIET/201 1, dt.26-10-2013 issued by the 3rd respondent andthe consequential proceedings vide G.O.Rt.No.33 dt.'t7-01-2014 issued by the 1strespondent, pending disposal of the writ petition.
LA. NO: 2OF 201MP. NO: 20327 OF 2014
Petition under Section ['151 ]CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased directthe respondents to publish the 1st year D.Ed Examinations results of the studentsof the petitioner institution for the academic year 2O12-20'13, pending disposal ofthe main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.A.K.MYNUDDINCounsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3 TO 5: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUGATIONCounsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDAWRIT PETITION No.434O of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf ofrespondents.
2. The petationer approached this Court seeking therelief as under:
"to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents in rejecting thelist of the admitted candidates of the petitionerinstitution to write 1't year D.Ed examinations for theacademic year 2Ol2-20L3 vide RC.No.9/N 1-3lDlET/2OlL, dt 26.10.2013 by the 3'd respondent andconforming the same by the 1't respondent videG.O.Rt.No.33, dt L7.01.2014 denying the relaxationlist of the admitted candidates of the petitionerinstitution to write 1't year D.Ed examinations for theacademic year 2Ol2-20L3 vide RC.No.9/N 1-3lDlET/2OlL, dt 26.10.2013 by the 3'd respondent andconforming the same by the 1't respondent videG.O.Rt.No.33, dt L7.01.2014 denying the relaxationgiven to the BC, ST, SC, students as illegal, arbitraryand Contrary to Rule 3(2)b of NCTE Norms andStandards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher EducationProgramme, 2009 and violation of Art. 30(1) of theand Contrary to Rule 3(2)b of NCTE Norms andStandards for Diploma in Elementary Teacher EducationProgramme, 2009 and violation of Art. 30(1) of theConstitution of India, 1950, consequently direct therespondents to allow the students of the petitionerinstitution to write the 1't year D.Ed examinations forthe academic year 2OL2-2013, and pass such otherorder or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit andprcper."respondents to allow the students of the petitionerinstitution to write the 1't year D.Ed examinations forthe academic year 2OL2-2013, and pass such otherorder or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit andprcper."
3. It is represented by learned Assistant GovernmentPleader appearing on behalf of respondents that, the cause of tI
action in the present writ petition does not survive foradjudication any more.adjudication any more.
4. Bringing the above said submission on record, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However,there shall be no order as to costs.there shall be no order as to costs.
5. Interim orders granted by this Court on 25.02.2074,shall also stands vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this WritPetition, shall stand closed.
SO/. K.SREERAMA MURTHYASSISTANT REG]STRAR.="r,fr, *r,"r*
//TRUE COPY//
To
1. 9n" 9n" [CC ][to SRt ][S.A.K.M-YN_UDD|N, ]Advocate IOPUCI2. !*9 CCs to Gp FOR SCHOOL
1. 9n" 9n" [[S.A.K.M-YN_UDD|N, ]]Advocate IOPUCI2. !*9 CCs to Gp FOR SCHOOL EOUCnIOr.r,'[igi iourt forthe State of^ [Telangana, at ][Hyderabad. ][[OUTI - ][.' ][.- ][-i ][I ][.Y' ][i]3. ]ryo CCs CCs to cp FOR SOCTAL SOCTAL FOR SOCTAL SOCTAL
^ [[Hyderabad. ]]3. ]ryo CCs to cp FOR SOCTAL SOCTAL WLLFARE, High Court for the Srate of SOCTAL . [Telangana, at ][Hyderabad. ][OUT]Two CD
4. . Two CD Copies
PSK.
GJ g
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
WP.No.4340 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
(}q,:'o€[ro])5
1 [\.\E STAT]e(qII I [FtB ][?t"?f]i:t)lI.i Ljj.::. [,r']. i*., ..'/ !it:a,t,t [.i--, ],:,r