Telangana High Court
WP/11766/2002 of Subhas Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2009
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.11766 OF 2002 Dated 31st December, 2009 Between: Subhash Kumar …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Praesh rep. By Its Secretary and eight others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents 1 to
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.11766 OF 2002
Dated 31st December, 2009
Between:
Subhash Kumar …Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Praesh rep. By
Its Secretary and eight others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: None appeared Counsel for respondents 1 to 4: None appearedCounsel for respondents 5 to 9: Sri T.C.D.Sekhar for Sri P.Venu Gopal The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“The petitioner herein prays that this Hon’bleCourt may be pleaded to issue an appropriatewrit, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus:- (a)to declare the action of respondent No.2 inmanipulating the revenue records in respect ofthe property/land to an extent of Acs.6.15guntas in Survey No.15/1, situated atHydershahkote Village, RajendranagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal,arbitrary, bad in law and without any lawfulactivity.
(b) To declare the inaction on the part ofrespondent No.4 to initiate action on therepresentation of the petitioner dated03.05.2002 by effecting requisite changes inthe said revenue records thereby removingthe illegality and restoring the position of therevenue records to its originality as illegal andsuffers from malafide, improper motive and ill-will.
(c) To declare the inaction on the part ofrespondents 2 and 3 in not initiating anyaction on the representation of the petitionerdated 03.05.2002 is unlawful and prejudicialto the legitimate right of the petitioner and (d)Consequently direct respondents 1 to 3 toorder an enquiry into illegalities ofmanipulation of revenue records committed byrespondent No.4 in connivance and collusionwith respondents 5 to 9 by initiating act on therepresentation of the petitioner dated03.05.2002.
(e) Direct respondent No.4 to correct the revenuerecords in respect of the property/land to anextent of Acs.6.15 guntas in Survey No.15/1situated at Hydershahkote, RajendranagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District by correctlyinserting the original true name of the pattadaras M/s Joharilal and Company wherever it ismanipulated as ‘Joharilal’.”records in respect of the property/land to anextent of Acs.6.15 guntas in Survey No.15/1situated at Hydershahkote, RajendranagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District by correctlyinserting the original true name of the pattadaras M/s Joharilal and Company wherever it ismanipulated as ‘Joharilal’.”
On 29.12.2009, there was no representation for the petitioner bothin the forenoon and again in the afternoon. Therefore, the case wasadjourned to 30.12.2009 to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”.On 30.12.2009 also there was no appearance for the petitioner. Thecase was, therefore, adjourned for today. Even today also, there is norepresentation for the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presumethat the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. The writpetition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Dated 31[st] December, 2009
vrn