Telangana High Court
WP/14878/1999 of Mudiyala Venkata Chelma Reddy, Vs The A.P.,Transmission Corporation (Pervisously part of APESB on 26 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 14878 of 1999 Between: 1 Mudiyala Venkata Chelma Reddy, S/o M.Pedda Venkata
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 14878 of 1999
Between:
1 Mudiyala Venkata Chelma Reddy, S/o M.Pedda VenkataReddy,
L.D.C./RC., Electricity Revenue Office, A.P.Transco., Dhone.
2 M.Rama Krishna, S/o M.Sikhamani,
L.D.C./RC., Electricity Revenue Office, A.P.Transco., Kurnool.
3 P.Siddeswara, S/o Mallarappa,
L.D.C./RC., Divisional Office, The Divisional Electrical Engineer,A.P.Transco., Adoni.
4 A.C.Lakshmanna, S/o A.Bheemappa,
L.D.C./RC., Divisional Office, The Divisional Electrical Engineer,A.P.Transco., Adoni.
5 K.Hanumesh Rao, S/o K.Vasantha Rao,
L.D.C./RC., Divisional Office, The Divisional Electrical Engineer,A.P.Transco., Adoni.
6 M.Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Late M.Ankalappa,
L.D.C./RC., Electricity Revenue Office (Rurals).. A.P.Transco., Kurnool.
7 S.Riajuddin, S/oS.Sirajuddin,
L.D.C./RC., Sub Electricity Revenue Office (Rurals).. A.P.Transco.,Nandikotkur, Kurnool Dsitrict.
8 R.Jagadeswarappa, S/oLate R.Nagappa,
L.D.C./RC., Sub Electricity Revenue Office (Rurals).. A.P.Transco.,Nandikotkur, Kurnool Dsitrict.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1 The A.P.,Transmission Corporation (Pervisously part of APESBRep.by its Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad.
2 The Supertending Engineer (Operation) Circle, A.P.Transco., Kurnool 3 The Chief Engineer (Electricity) A.P.Transco., Cuddpah Zone, Cuddpah District.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Smt.V.Hima Bindu for MR.P.VEERA REDDY
Smt.V.Hima Bindu
Counsel for the Respondents : P.R.BALARAMI REDDY(SC FORAP TRANSCO)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“For the reasons stated in the affidavitaccompanying, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issuean appropriate Writ, order or a direction mostly one which isin the nature of "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the TranscoO.O.No.89, dt 3-4-1999 issued by the 1[st] Respondent asillegal, irregular, arbitrary unjustified, unconstitutional,unsustainable and unreasonable and contrary to the BPMSNo.99, dt 29-1-88 and the relevant rules and regulationsissued in BPMS No.89, dt 2-2-1970 and set aside thesame.”
At the hearing, Smt.V.Hima Bindu, learned counsel,representing Sri P.Veera Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits thatsubsequent to the filing of this writ petition, the petitioners were givenpromotions, and hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survivefor consideration.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as infructuous,WPMP.No.18297 of 1999 filed by the petitioners for interim relief isdisposed of as infructuous.
Dated:26.12.2008
________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
GJ