Telangana High Court
WP/28043/2007 of Pedalanka, Pesaralanka Field Labour Tenants Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28043 of 2007 Between: Pedalanka. .. PETITIONER and The District Collector and others. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28043 of 2007 ORDER: It is the case of the petitioner Society that while considering
Between:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.28043 of 2007
Pedalanka.
.. PETITIONER
and
The District Collector and others.
.. RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.28043 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is the case of the petitioner Society that while considering its claimwith regard to encroachment of the land and for grant of patta, the 2[nd]respondent passed an order in proceedings in D.Dis.No.3017/1994-D, dated23-04-2007, allotting the land in favour of the members of the petitionerSociety admeasuring Ac.83-36 cents in Sy.No.86, Pedalanka Village,Bhattirolu Mandal, Guntur District, and in respect of certain small extents,some third parties are found as encroachers, and accordingly, the saidencroachers were ordered to be given pattadar pass books. It is stated thatthe members of the petitioner Society were in occupation of some moreextent of the land than Ac.83-36 cents. Therefore, the petitioner Society filedan appeal along with stay application before the 1[st] respondent on 27-10-2007 not to allot left over land admeasuring Ac.38-14 cents in Sy.No.86,Pedalanka Village, Bhattirolu Mandal, Guntur District, to any third parties.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, if any appealis pending before the 1[st] respondent against the order of the 2[nd] respondentin proceedings in D.Dis.No.3017/1994-D, dated 23-04-2007, the 1[st]respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the stay application first asexpeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order, and then take up the main appeal forhearing and disposal.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order asto costs.
___________
28-12-2007