Telangana High Court
WP/24825/1998 of Dr.K.chandan, Vs The Vice Chancellor, on 27 December 2005
Mr. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Writ Petition No.24825 of 1998 Dated: December 27, 2005 Between: Dr. K. Chandan, S/o. K. Narasaiah, Hindu, aged about 41 years, OCC: Reader, Statistics in Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur, R/o. Guntur Town & District. … Petitioner And The
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
Writ Petition No.24825 of 1998
Dated: December 27, 2005
Between:
Dr. K. Chandan, S/o. K. Narasaiah,
Hindu, aged about 41 years,
OCC: Reader, Statistics in Nagarjuna
University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur,
R/o. Guntur Town & District.
… Petitioner
And
The Vice Chancellor, Nagarjuna
University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur,
and two others.
… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
This writ petition has been filed seeking Mandamus declaring that the proceedingsin No. NU//SPL-SEC (E)/S3/MSC.Stat (F)/March 98, dated 08-08-1998 of the ViceChancellor of the Nagarjuna University, as illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction.
2. By the impugned order, it was ordered that the petitioner, an Internal Examiner,Department of Statistics, University College, shall not be given any futureassignment relating to examinations (Practical & Theory) for a period of three yearsfrom 1998-99 academic year.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that before issuing the impugnedproceedings, no notice was issued to the petitioner. In fact, respondents admitted thesaid fact in their counter affidavit.
4. This Court while admitting the writ petition, by its order dated 09-09-1998, orderedinterim suspension of the impugned proceedings.
5. The impugned order, directs non-assignment of examination related matters for aperiod of three years. The petitioner filed the writ petition in the year 1997 andobtained interim suspension of the impugned order. Since the three years periodhad already elapsed and the interim order granted by this court had worked out foritself, no cause survives for adjudication in the writ petition.
6. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No costs.
__________________
N.V. RAMANA, J.
December 27, 2005
MRR