Telangana High Court
WP/15978/2009 of B.Ashok Kumar Goud Vs The Collector on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: '15978 OF 2009 Between: AND 1 2. B.Ashok Kgmaq Goud, S/o Late_ Chandraiah,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: '15978 OF 2009
Between:
B.Ashok Kgmaq Goud, S/o Late_ Chandraiah, aged about 52 years, Occ:Busines_s, PIot No.18, HIG Hills Colony, Vanathaiipuram, L.B t{dgar, Rang;Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1The Collector, Ranga Reddy District office at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad
2.The Revenue Divsional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga ReddyDistrict at Goshamahal HyderabadDistrict at Goshamahal Hyderabad The Thasildar, Hayathnagar fVandal, Ranga Reddy District J
4Sri Erukala Balaiah, S/o Late Ramaiah, aged about 70 years, Occ: AgricultureTaramathipet Village, Hayathnagar lVandal, Ranga Reddy DistrictTaramathipet Village, Hayathnagar lVandal, Ranga Reddy District 5Sri. S.lej {umar, S/g Late Shankar Gangaiah, Aged about 68 years, Occ:Retd. Service, R/o H.No.1-2-36512O1C, Domalguda,-HyderabadRetd. Service, R/o H.No.1-2-36512O1C, Domalguda,-Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writof Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents respondents 1 to 3 notof Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents respondents 1 to 3 notentertaintaining the application of the 4th respondent protected tenants and Sthrespondent landlords under the Provisions of AP(TA) and Agriculture landstenancy and proceedings lands Acts 1950 in respect of the agricultural land in syNo ['169 ]and ['1 ]70 total admeasuring Ac 26-21 guntas at Taramathipet(V)tenancy and proceedings lands Acts 1950 in respect of the agricultural land in syNo ['169 ]and ['1 ]70 total admeasuring Ac 26-21 guntas at Taramathipet(V)Hayathnagar(M) R.R District in between the protected tenants and landlords aslong as the civil Suit Os No 833/2008 on the file of 2nd Additional District JudgeR.R District is as filed by the petitioner against the protected tenants andlong as the civil Suit Os No 833/2008 on the file of 2nd Additional District JudgeR.R District is as filed by the petitioner against the protected tenants and landlords of the above land to also without putting the petitioner on notice asillegal unlawful contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3not entertain an.y such application in between the protected tenants andlandlords of the above land as long as the civil suit OS No 833/2008 is pending.not entertain an.y such application in between the protected tenants andlandlords of the above land as long as the civil suit OS No 833/2008 is pending.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.DAMODAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI BHOJRAJ MURALIDHAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRt AVANCHA H.CHAKRAVARTHY
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15978 of 2OO9
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that the cause in the writ petition does not survivefor adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the WritPetition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shallstand closed.
SD/. K.AMMAJIASSISTANTISR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. One CC to SRI [M.DAMODAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]]
2. One CC to [SRI ][AVANCHA ][H.CHAKRAVARTHY, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]
3. One CC to [SRI BHOJRAJ MURALIDHAR RAO, ][Advocate ][IOPUC]]
4. Two CCs to [GP FOR ][REVENUE, High Court ][for ][the ][State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad [OUT]Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD CoPies
BSR
GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2911212023
'toYva{"\^ta")otJFo(a>Ao*oHo
ORDER
WP.No.15978 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS