Telangana High Court

CRLRC/156/2024 of Smt. K. Kanakalakshmi Pragna Devi Vs The State of A. P. , on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY , THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 156OF 2024 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr PC against the

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY ,THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 156OF 2024

Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and [401 ][of ][Cr ][PC ][against]the Order dated 21.02.2014 in Crl.M.P. [No.2091 ][of 2014in ][Crime ][No.56 ][of ][2007]on the file of the Court of the Metropolitan Sessions [Judge, Hyderabad.]

Between:

Smt. K. Kanakalakshmi Pragna Devi, W/o. K. C. K- Moorthy, [aged ][about ][45_years,]Occ House wife, Ryo. 5- 5- {5122518 and [5- ]5- [35122518,11, ][Plot No. ][53, ][Mythri Nagar,]Kukatpally, Hyderabad-

...Petitioner/Petitioner.

AND

The State of A. P. ,, Through rep. by Public Prosecutor, High [Court ]of [A. P. ],Hyderabad.

...RespondenUResPondent.

Counsel for the Petitioner SRl. V Roopesh Kumar [Reddy]

Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Vizarath Ali, Asst Public [Prosecutor ][(TG)]

The Court made the following ORDER:

\

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPALCRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.156 OF 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal llevlsion Case is filed against the order dated21.2.2014 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2O9l of [2074 ]in [Cr.No.56 ][of]2OO7 on thc file of the learned Metropolitan [Sessions ][Judge,]Hyderabzrd [(for ]short, "the trial Court").2. No representation on behalf ol the petitioner. HeardMr. Vizzrrath Ali, lezrrned Assistant Public [Prosecutor ][appearing]for the rcspondent State

3. There was no rcpresentation on behalf of the petitioner on19.12.2023. Even toclay also there is no [representation ][on ][behalf]of the petitioner. Tl-rerelbre, this Court is inclined [to ][proceed ][with]the mattcr on merits of the case as [per ]the [decisron of ][the ][Hon''ble]Apex Court in "Bani Singh and others Vs. State of Utter Pradesh)",wherein it was categorically held that the High Court cannotdismiss arly appeal lor non prosecution simpliciter withoutexamining thc mcrits

4. Thc bricf facts of the case zrre that the trial Court vide orderdated 21 .2.2O11 in Crl.M.P.No.2O91 of 2074 in Cr.No.56 of 2OO7

I ( lc)961 I Slrl)r(rnc ( irLrrr ('l.c:710

,')

re

on [the ][file of the iearned ][Mctropolitan ][Sessions ][Judge, ][Hyderabad]directed [the ][petitioner ][to ][give ][a ][security ][in ][the ][fortn ][of ][ltxed]eposit [for ][Rs.72,8O,7 ][lO ][/ ][- ][along ][with two ][sureties ][for].rcpoo/- [each. ][Aggrieved ][by the ][same, ][the ][present ][Revision],tcase [is ][filed]

A [perusal of ][the ][record shows ][that this ][matter ][pertains ][to]e year, [2074. ][Upon careful consideration ][of ][the entire material]lvailatt. [on ][record, ][this ][Court ][is of ][the view ][that ][petitioner ][who]::." ..:agitated [before ][this ][Court ][is not ][evincing ][any ][interest ][to].-,. ,t,f,.prosecute his [case. ][Therefore, ][this ][Court ][is ][not ][ir-rclined ][to],.1':6nt<irtain [the ][Revision ][as ][the ][same ][is ][devoid ][of merits.]

I

6. Accordingly, [the ][Criminal ][Revision ][Case ][is ][dismissed.]

Miscellaneous [Petitions, pending if any, shall stand ][closed]

Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNADEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,1The Metropolitan [Sessions ]Judge, Hyderabad.1The Metropolitan [Sessions ]Judge, Hyderabad.

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, [OUT]

2

JOne CC to [Sri ][V ][Roopesh ]Kumar Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]

4Two CD Copies.

Jgldkam

U(

HIGH COURTDATED:2911212023

ORDERLi.CRLRC.No.156 of 2024'r15 APfr 2fr24z{,)])-4'.PA.TcHec DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE

T4d'W6q-'r

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead