Telangana High Court
CRP/3317/2004 of M/s. Pola Vishwanadham Vs M/s. Kalyani Agencies, on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE : G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3317 of 2004 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE : G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3317 of 2004
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order anddecree of the court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, made in EA.No.349/2002 in EP.No.366/2000 dt. 19-02-2004.
Between:
1.M/s. Pola Vishwanadham, a business concern, rep. by Pole Kadarinadham
2.Pola Kadarinadham
3.Pola Jayalaxmi.
Petitioners
AND
M/s. Kalyani Agencies, Warangal, rep. by its Partner Goli Sundarayya, S/o.Lingaiah, Nirma Dealer, S.V.N.Road, Opp: Inthezar Gunj Police Station, Warangal.
Respondent
The petition coming on for orders as to admission upon perusing thememorandum of grounds filed therein and the order of the High Court dated 1-9-2004 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. G.Ramachandra Reddy,advocate for the petitioner and the court made the following order:
“ Post after two weeks.
In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file proof ofservice.”
// TRUE COPY //
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal District.
2. Goli Sundarayya, S/o. Lingaiah, Partner, M/s. Kalyani Agencies, Warangal,Nirma Dealer, S.V.N.Road, Opp: Inthezar Gunj Police Station, WarangalDistrict.Nirma Dealer, S.V.N.Road, Opp: Inthezar Gunj Police Station, WarangalDistrict.
3. One spare copy.
chr
HIGH COURT
RGJ
DATED: 17-9-2004
POST AFTER TWO WEEKS
ORDER C.R.P.NO. 3317 OF 2004
DIRECTION
DRAFTED BY CHRDATED:22-9-2004
HIGH COURT
RGJ
DATED: 17-9-2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
C.R.P.NO. 3317 OF 2004