Telangana High Court

WP/28065/2007 of Feroz Khan Vs The Asst.,Secretary, Regional Transport Authority on 31 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO. 28065 OF 2007 Dated : December 31, 2007 Between: Feroz Khan Petitioner AND The Asst. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority (South Zone),

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OFANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIAND

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI

WRIT PETITION NO.28065 OF 2007

Dated : December 31, 2007

Between:

Feroz Khan

Petitioner

AND

The Asst. Secretary,Regional Transport Authority (South Zone),Bahadurpura, Hyderabad and another Respondents THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI

AND

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI

WRIT PETITION NO.28065 OF 2007

ORAL ORDER:(per THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI)

The petitioner’s motor vehicle bearing No.KA/25A- 9674 was seized by the 2[nd] respondent on 25.12.2007vide Vehicle Check Report No.2099678 for certainirregularities pointed out in the said vehicle check report.The seizure was affected under Section 207 of the MotorVehicles Act. The grievance of the petitioner is that therespondents have not yet released the vehicle.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government Pleader for Transport.

Since no purpose would be served by keeping thevehicle in the custody of the respondents and the vehiclewould only get damaged, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the respondents to forthwith release the subjectmotor vehicle to the interim custody of the petitionersubject to the petitioner depositing Rs.10,000/- (Rupeesten thousands only) and on filing an undertaking that hewould not transfer the vehicle pending enquiry and that hewould produce the vehicle as and when the same isrequired by the respondent authorities in the course ofenquiry and investigation. No order as to costs.

With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.No order as to costs.

December 31, 2007

Operative Portion by wireat party’s costs //BO//MAS

____________________

T.MEENA KUMARI, J.

____________

G.ROHINI, J.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead