Telangana High Court
WP/24362/2004 of Muduganti Suryamma Hanumanth Reddy Education Society rep Vs The Government of A.P., rep by Principal on 26 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004 DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005 BETWEEN: MUDUGANTI SURYAMMA HANUMANTHA REDDY EDUCATION SOCIETY, ADILABAD … PETITIONER AND THE GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND OTHERS … RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004
DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005
BETWEEN:
MUDUGANTI SURYAMMA HANUMANTHA REDDYEDUCATION SOCIETY, ADILABAD
… PETITIONER
AND
THE GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND
OTHERS … RESPONDENTS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R :
1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Muduganti Suryamma Hanumantha ReddyEducation Society represented by its Secretary M.V.Narasimha Reddy assailing theaction of The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Hyderabad- 2[nd]respondent in not reconsidering their application for establishing B.Ed college atAsifabad, Adilabad as per G.O.Ms.No.398 dated 4.12.1997.
2. The petitioner is a Society registered under Societies Registration Act. Thepetitioner-society submitted an application for grant of No Objection Certificate. Theapplication of the petitioner-society came to be rejected on 31.12.2001. Thereafterthe petitioner submitted another application to reconsider for grant of No ObjectionCertificate. Since no action has been taken by the respondents 1 and 2, thepetitioner-society has chosen to approach this Court by invoking Article 226 of theConstitution of India.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-society and learned Government Pleaderfor School Education appearing for respondents 1 and 2.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-society submits that the petitioner-society submitted an application to 2[nd] respondent to reconsider for grant of NoObjection Certificate and 2[nd] respondent has not passed any orders and therefore adirection is required to be given to the 2[nd] respondent to pass appropriate orders.Copies of the representations have been placed on record.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing 2[nd] respondent toreconsider the representations submitted by the petitioner-society as perG.O.Ms.No.398, dated 4.12.1997 and pass appropriate orders within four weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Dt: 26-12-2005. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy, J )
tnb
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEB.SESHASAYANA REDDY
DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005