Telangana High Court

WP/24362/2004 of Muduganti Suryamma Hanumanth Reddy Education Society rep Vs The Government of A.P., rep by Principal on 26 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004 DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005 BETWEEN: MUDUGANTI SURYAMMA HANUMANTHA REDDY EDUCATION SOCIETY, ADILABAD … PETITIONER AND THE GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND OTHERS … RESPONDENTS THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004

DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005

BETWEEN:

MUDUGANTI SURYAMMA HANUMANTHA REDDYEDUCATION SOCIETY, ADILABAD

… PETITIONER

AND

THE GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND

OTHERS … RESPONDENTS

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE

B.SESHASAYANA REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO.24362 OF 2004

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R :

1. This Writ Petition has been filed by Muduganti Suryamma Hanumantha ReddyEducation Society represented by its Secretary M.V.Narasimha Reddy assailing theaction of The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Hyderabad- 2[nd]respondent in not reconsidering their application for establishing B.Ed college atAsifabad, Adilabad as per G.O.Ms.No.398 dated 4.12.1997.

2. The petitioner is a Society registered under Societies Registration Act. Thepetitioner-society submitted an application for grant of No Objection Certificate. Theapplication of the petitioner-society came to be rejected on 31.12.2001. Thereafterthe petitioner submitted another application to reconsider for grant of No ObjectionCertificate. Since no action has been taken by the respondents 1 and 2, thepetitioner-society has chosen to approach this Court by invoking Article 226 of theConstitution of India.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-society and learned Government Pleaderfor School Education appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-society submits that the petitioner-society submitted an application to 2[nd] respondent to reconsider for grant of NoObjection Certificate and 2[nd] respondent has not passed any orders and therefore adirection is required to be given to the 2[nd] respondent to pass appropriate orders.Copies of the representations have been placed on record.

5. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing 2[nd] respondent toreconsider the representations submitted by the petitioner-society as perG.O.Ms.No.398, dated 4.12.1997 and pass appropriate orders within four weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Dt: 26-12-2005. ( B.Seshasayana Reddy, J )

tnb

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEB.SESHASAYANA REDDY

DISPOSED OF ON 26-12-2005

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead