Telangana High Court
CRP/1240/2016 of S.NAGESHWAR RAO Vs M/S. SHRIRAM CHITS PRIVATE LTD., AND 5 OTHERS on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRPfiledunderSectionll5C.P'C.againsttheorderDate26-12-2015inEPNo'2 of 2010 in o.s.346 0r ZObo on tne iite of the court of the II
FRIDAY,THE [THIRTY ][FIRST DAY OF ][DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND TWENTY ][ONE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [DR. JUSTICE ][CHILLAKUR ][SUMALATHA]
I
CRPfiledunderSectionll5C.P'C.againsttheorderDate26-12-2015inEPNo'2of 2010 in o.s.346 [0r ][ZObo ][on ][tne ][iite ][of ][the ][court ][of the ][II ][Additional ][Dlstrict]ludge Nalgonda [at ][Suryapet, ][Nalgonda ][District]
Between:
S.NAGESHWAR [RAO, ][S/0. ][Venkatnarayana ][Occ: ][Private ][Clerk ][R/o' H'No' ][10-10/2']6oiia-eazai.Vaohav [irtalar, ][Kodad ][Villale ][and ][Mandal, Nalgonda ][District']
.,..PETITIONER/4IH [l. ][DR.]
AND
1. ' M/S. [i3'si.. SHRIRAM sil h;;'il; [CHITS ][PRIVATE ]sunio|. r']unls.',.lt-e<jat) [LTD., Rep. ][by its ]R/o' [GPA ]Gandhinasar' [Holder ][sri ch' ][Hvderabad'][Venugopal]
2. V. Chandra Shekar, [S/o. ][Yellaiah Occ:Business ][R/o' H'No' ][3-247-l0l5lA'Kodad']- occi [aiei colour La6, Prameela Towers, Kodad'- occi [aiei colour La6, Prameela Towers, Kodad'
3. Ch. Srinivasa [Rao,, ][R/o. ][H.No. ][2-64 (Old) 5-80,(New),Old ][Chilukur ][Village' ][Kodad]Mandal, Nalgonda [District']Mandal, Nalgonda [District']
4. V. Srinivasa [Rao, ][S/o. Venkateshwarlu, ][Occ: Venkateswara ][Auto Xeroc' R/o']" i.il;. ibnils:rs1, rt Floor, above, Manjula Herbal Beauty Parlour'Azadnagar, [Koilad, ][Nalgonda ][District']" i.il;. ibnils:rs1, rt Floor, above, Manjula Herbal Beauty Parlour'Azadnagar, [Koilad, ][Nalgonda ][District']
5. Nani Yadi [Reddy,, ][S/o. ][Muthyam ][Reddy, ][R/o' H'No' 3-218/2' ][Nayanagar' ][Kodad']Nalgonda District.Nalgonda District.
6. Ch.Satyanrayana,, [S/o. ][Buchaiah, ][5-80 (Old), ][Old Chilikuru Village and Mandal']Kodad, Nalgonda [District.]Kodad, Nalgonda [District.]
.....RESPoNDENTS/l.DRS.
I.A. NO: [1][oF ][20][ 6(CRP][ MP. ][N]1565 oF 2016)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheaffidavit [filed in ][support ][of ][the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to-grant],tav oi ulr [rurther ][pioceedings including arrest ][oi the ][petitioner in ][EP ][No. ][2_of 2010]on [nL fif" of [II ][Additional Districrt Judge, ][Nalgonda ][at ][Suryapet, ][Nalgonda ][District]
Counsel for the [Petitioner: ][SRI' ][V'BRAHMAIAH ][CHOWDARY]
counsel for the [Respondent: ][r'ro'flhanrswARA ][RAo ][KUNcHEAM]
Counsel for the [Respondent: ][NO'2 ][to ][6lNone]
The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
THE HON,]LE DR, JUSTICE [CHILLAKUR ][SUMAI,ATHA]REVISION [P][b-lll ION ][NO.1240 ()F 2016]CIVI]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Diwal:ar, leamed counsel [representing ][on ][behalf ][of ][Sri]V.Brahmaiah C howdary, [learned counsel ][for the ][petitioner, ][seeks]time to [proceed ]with the [matter, ][even ][though ][the ][matter ][is ][posted]under the capti tn 'for [dismissal'']
On 26. I 1 .2021, this Court [made ][the following order:-]
"Lea: ned. counsel [for the ][respondent submitted ][that ][by]obtaining s:ay, the [petitioner ][has not turned ][up ][arld ][amount]ordered to )e deposited [is ][also ][not ][deposited".]
On 02.ll .2021, the following [order was ][passed:-]
"Lea [-ned ]counsel for the [petitioner ][prays ][time to submit]his contenr ions. List the [matter ][on 23.12.2021"]
On 23.12.2021, learned [counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner ][again]sought time.
Sri Mal eswara Rao [Kuncham, learned counsel ][for ][the]respondents, [r ]ehemently [opposed ][to ][grant time ][on ][the ground ][that]the petitioner is continuously [dragging ][on ][the ][matter and ][the]amount order, to be [paid ][through ][interim ][order ][is ][also ][not ][paid']'d However, to [g ]ive fair opportunity, [the matter ][stood ][adjourned ][to]this day. Evet t on this [day, learned counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner ][seeks]time.
Having regard to the earlier [orders made ][and ][as ][fair]opportunity a nd ample [time ][is ][given ][to ][the ][petitioner ][till ][now ][to]submit his contentions and [in ][view ][of his ][failure ][to ][submit ][his]contentions, his Court is [of ][the view ][that ][there are no ][grounds,]whatsoever, t [) ]grant further [time.]
To,
3.4
VMnTR4.
Resultantly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
There shal1 be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
SD/-K.AMMAJI
ASSISTANT REGISTRARl],bSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE [COPY ]I I
The II Additional District Judge [Nalgonda ][at ][Suryapet, ][Nalgonda ][District]One CC to SRI [V.BRAHMAIAH ][CHOWDARYAdvocate ][OPUC]One CC to SRI [MAHESWARA RAO ][KUNCHEAM,AdVOCATC ][OPUC]Two CD CopiesOne Spare Copy HIGH COURTDNEDt3r.lLzl2O2L
i4:'L),/\?nit2C2?LJ
ORDERCRP.No.1240 [of ][2016]
DISMISSING [THE ][C ][IVIL ][REVISTON ][PETITION ][FOR ][NON-PROSECUTION ][']
r'