Telangana High Court
WP/16495/2009 of K.Satish Kumar Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its on 31 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.16495, 16496 and 20883 of 2009 COMMON ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. These writ petitions are filed declaring the action of the respondents and their subordinate
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAOWRIT PETITION Nos.16495, 16496 and 20883 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learnedGovernment Pleader for the respondents.
These writ petitions are filed declaring the action of therespondents and their subordinate officers in insisting the petitioners toobtain “Police Permits” and pay Rs.100/- per day in respect of thevehicles in question as illegal and arbitrary.
It is submitted by both the learned counsel that the issue raised inthese writ petitions is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court inW.P.No.28764 of 2008, dated 18-06-2014.
Following the same, these writ petitions are allowed directing therespondents not to insist the petitioners for payment of the amountstowards “Police permits”, which is not authorized by law. Themiscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shallbe no order as to costs.
_____________________________
(A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J)
31.12.2014
Prv
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.16495, 16496 and 20883 of 2009
31-12-2014