Telangana High Court
WP/34536/2021 of Mrs. Khaja Bee Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN AND 1 Mrs. Khaja Bee, M/o Late Mrs. Shakara fathima, W/o Late Mohd Maheboob Ali, H.no
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 34536 OF 2021
Between:
Mrs. Khaja Bee, M/o Late Mrs. Shakara fathima, W/o Late Mohd MaheboobAli, H.no 16-2-8351122/36 Gandhi Nagar Asman Gadh Hyderabad TelanganaState
...PETrroNER
AND
1The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Secretariat Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat Hyderabad.
2The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Abids, Hyderabad.
3The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,Secretariat Hyderabad.Secretariat Hyderabad.
4. Pasupuleti Jayamma, Wo P. Kamalesh H.No. Block no.6,42 GF Vambaycolony lllegal occupant colony lllegal occupant
...RE.'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one inthe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring occupancy of the flat without anythe nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring occupancy of the flat without anysanction of law, arbitrary, high handed, contrary to law and in violation ofprinciples of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent toconsider the representation of the petitioner dated 09-02-2021.consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09-02-2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. MARIYA SULTANA REPRESENTING FORSRI MD. FASIUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: [- ]- - [-]
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HI)\'BLE SRI .IT.ISTICE K. LAKSIINI [1.i\]
\\'llll' I'}I'.TI1'lON No.3-15-16 OI 2l)2l oRAL Ot{l)Et I
Ms. Mar i1,a Sultana, learned counsel repres,lr Ling Mr. MdFasiuddin. Iearr ed lirr the petitioner, seeks permission o1'tlris Coun towithdraw the prcsent writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writpetition. She iras also made an endorsement on the ,:rrse file to thatelfcct Granting libcrty, as sought, the present Writ I)et ti,rn Ls disrnissedas rvithdrau n. Iorvever, there shall be no order as to c('sl.s.
As a seq.re l, rnisccllancous petitions, il any, pending in the WritPetition shall st rnd closed SD/. C,PR,AVEEN KUMARASIir$ TAryT. [REGISTRAR]sel;rlBru oFFrcER
//TRUE COPY//
To,1 . The [Princi ]ral [Secretary, ][Revenue Department, ][The ][State ][of ][l ][elangana']Secretarie I Hvderabad.z in" oliiil i cbtlector, [Hvderabad District, ][Abids, ][Hyderabad']5. in" [piiriC ][pai ][Secretdry,'Home ][Department, The ][State ][rf ][Telangana']Secretari€ t Hyderabad.+ oni, cc ti [, ]sfr.t rrlo. [rnstuoDlN, ][Advocate ][oPUc] -d. iil aar ,JcF [rbn ][REVENUE, High ][couri ][for ][the ][strte ][of 'lelangana']IOUTIo iir"o'iC" :o GP [FOR HOME, High Court for the State ][c'f ][l-elangana ][lOUTl]7. Two CD [( ][.oPies]BN'\,tt HIGH COUFT
DATED:3011212022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.345ii6 of 2021
DISMISS!N(i THE WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDIIAWNWITHOUT [(]OSTS]
v
lriE [Sf4]16:,4r)())tl 2 Fn 2023z?-\t)/"\'7- <::r:--a--:--;'_