Telangana High Court
WP/28269/2009 of M/s. Chitra Silicates AND Chemicals, Vs The Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited, on 29 December 2009
MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.28269 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner claims to have filed an application before the 2nd respondent with a request to refer the dispute between itself and the 1st respondent to arbitration. It is urged that though the application was submitted on
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWrit Petition No.28269 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner claims to have filed an applicationbefore the 2[nd] respondent with a request to refer thedispute between itself and the 1[st] respondent toarbitration. It is urged that though the application wassubmitted on 22.04.2009, no steps have been takenthereon and seeks appropriate directions.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Additional Standing Counsel for the CentralGovernment.
The effort of the petitioner is to initiate proceedingsunder the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (for short ‘theAct’). In case there exists any arbitration clause, in theconcerned agreement, the petitioner can straight awayinitiate the process by filing an application under Section11 of the Act before the authority concerned.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of leaving itopen to the petitioner to pursue the remedies under thesaid Act. There shall be no order as to costs.
JSU
_________
29.12.2009
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
JSU
Writ Petition No.28269 of 2009
Date: 29.12.2009