Telangana High Court
WP/11005/2003 of Ravela Babu Rao Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, on 29 December 2011
Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11005 OF 2003 Dated: 29.12.2011 Between : Ravela Babu Rao … Petitioner And The Revenue Divisional Officer and 2 others … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.11005 OF 2003
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.11005 OF 2003
Between :Ravela Babu Rao
Dated: 29.12.2011
… Petitioner
AndThe Revenue Divisional Officerand 2 others … Respondents The Court made the following:- THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINIWRIT PETITION No.11005 OF 2003
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the 1[st]respondent in entertaining the appeal filed by the 3[rd] respondentagainst the order dated 08.02.2001 passed by the 2[nd] respondent.
It is the specific case of the petitioner that the matter wascompromised between the parties during the pendency of theproceedings before the 2[nd] respondent and accordingly, the orderdated 08.02.2001 came to be passed in terms of the said compromise. Therefore, according to the petitioner, the 1[st] respondent ought not tohave entertained the appeal against the said order.
Despite notice, the respondents 1 to 3 did not choose to appear.This Court, while issuing rule nisi, by order dated 05.08.2003directed status quo existing as on that date should be maintained andthe said order has been in operation althrough.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances noticed aboveand in the light of the uncontraverted averments in the writ petition, theWrit Petition is allowed as prayed for. No costs.
___________
G. ROHINI, J
Date: 29.12.2011Ivd