Telangana High Court
WP/26965/2006 of Smt. Yera latha, Vs Municipal Corpaorationof Warangal, on 28 December 2006
SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26965 of 2006 Between: Yera Latha ……Petitioner. And Municipal Corporation of Warangal, Warangal, represented by its Commissioner and others. ……Respondents. :: O R D E R ::
HON’BLE SHRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICEAND
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Writ Petition No.26965 of 2006
Between:
Yera Latha ……Petitioner.
AndMunicipal Corporation of Warangal,Warangal, represented by its Commissionerand others. ……Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:: O R D E R::
Counsel for the petitioner : Smt.K.V.Rajashree Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri S.V.Bhatt 28[th] December, 2006
Per G.S. SINGHVI, C.J.
In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a direction torespondent Nos.1 and 2 to take action in the matter of pollution causedby tyre retreading unit being operated by respondent No.3 in theresidential area.
We have heard Smt. K.V.Rajashree, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Sri S.V.Bhatt, learned counsel for the Andhra PradeshPollution Control Board (for short, ‘the Board’) and perused the record.
Admittedly, the Board has already issued notice dated 29-9-2006 to respondent No.3. In this view of the matter, we feel that endsof justice will be served if a direction is issued to the Board to passappropriate order in accordance with law within a period of two monthsfrom the date of receipt of copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.However, it is made clear that no action prejudicially affectingrespondent No.3 shall be taken and no order be passed against itwithout giving the said respondent proper opportunity of hearing.
The writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, WPMP.No.34651 of2006 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of asinfructuous.
G.S.SINGHVI, C.J.
28[th] December, 2006
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.