Telangana High Court
WP/26203/2007 of Ichrah Bai, Vs Revenue Divisional Officer, on 26 December 2007
V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.26203 of 2007 Date: December 26, 2007 Between: 1. Ichrah Bai and 3 others. … Petitioners And 1. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy (East Division), Goshamahal, Hyderabad and 7 others. … Respondents * * * ORDER: The petitioners claiming
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.26203 of 2007
Date: December 26, 2007
Between:
1. Ichrah Bai and 3 others. … Petitioners
And
1. Revenue Divisional Officer,
Ranga Reddy (East Division),
Goshamahal, Hyderabad
and 7 others. … Respondents
* * *
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioners claiming ownership on Ac.54-36 guntas insurvey Nos.293, 294 and 295 situated at Ravalkole village,Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, based on the registeredsale deed dated 12.9.1990, filed a petition before the RevenueDivisional Officer, Ranga Reddy (East Division), to incorporatetheir names in the possession column for the years 1989-’90 to1994-’95 and as the said petition could not dispose of, thepetitioners earlier filed W.P.No.26036 of 2006 and this court foundthat no orders were passed and accordingly directed the RevenueDivisional Officer to pass orders within ten days from the date ofreceipt of that order. The said writ petition was disposed of on27.12.2006.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that theprevious Presiding Officer was transferred and thereafter one
T. Manikyala Rao without hearing the arguments of the petitionerspassed the impugned order dated 08.10.2007 goes to show thatnotices were given calling upon both the parties and both the parties called absent on 19.5.2007 and 02.6.2007. Learnedcounsel further submits that no notices were served fixing date ofhearing on 19.5.2007. In so far as the date of fixing on 02.6.2007it is stated that the notice dated 28.5.2007 was self served on02.6.2007 and therefore the petitioner could not attend.
3. I am not inclined to express any opinion whether the noticehas been served or not as the petitioner got remedy of revisionunder Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar PassBooks Act, 1971.
4. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed with a liberty tofile a revision under Section 9 of the A.P. Rights in Land andPattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, before the District Collector. Nocosts.
Date: December 26, 2007.BSB
___________________
(V. ESWARAIAH, J)