Telangana High Court
WP/20491/2005 of Vurumu Nagavenkata Somasekhar S/o V. Veerabadra rao Vs Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Eluru Range on 27 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.20491 OF 2005 Dated: 27-12-2005 Between Vurumu Nagavenkata Somasekhar, S/o. V. Veerabadra Rao, Occ: Business, Chairman of the registered Trust No:866 Of 2003 called Vurum Nagavenkata Somasekhar and Mandavalli Kanaka Durgamba Oldage Home Trust,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.20491 OF 2005
Dated: 27-12-2005
Between
Vurumu Nagavenkata Somasekhar,
S/o. V. Veerabadra Rao, Occ: Business,
Chairman of the registered Trust No:866
Of 2003 called Vurum Nagavenkata
Somasekhar and Mandavalli Kanaka
Durgamba Oldage Home Trust,
Established under trust deed Dt.5-2-2003
In D.No.24 B-10-57, Panugantivari
Street Ramachandra Rao Pet, Eluru
West Godavari District.
…PETITIONER
AND
Deputy Inspector General of Police,
Eluru Range, West Godavari and others.
…RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the third respondent ininterfering with the affairs of the Nagavenkata Somasekhara and Mandavalli Kanakadurgamaba Old age home trust and threatening the Chairman and members of thetrust in the name of settlement of civil disputes and the inaction on the part of therespondents 1 and 2 on his notice dated 12.09.2005 as illegal and arbitrary.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain civil disputes in respect ofthe said trust and the respondents are illegally interfering with the civil disputes andthreatening the Chairman and members of the trust in the name of settlement of civildisputes. Aggrieved by the illegal action of the respondents the petitioner got issued a legalnotice on 12.09.2005 in spite of the same the respondents have not stopped the illegalinterference.
Counter has been filed on behalf of the third respondent stating that the respondents havenever interfered with the civil disputes of the petitioner at any point of time and also nevercalled the petitioner to the police station by sending his subordinates as alleged by thepetitioner and all the allegations made by the petitioner have been denied.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the specific denial by the official respondents that the police is not interfering withthe civil disputes of the petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed in this writpetition.
The writ petition is accordingly closed.
______________
V. ESWARAIAH, J