Telangana High Court
WP/27501/2005 of Lakshmi Bai, Vs The Regional Manager, APSRTC, on 27 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.27501 of 2005 Date:27.12.2005 Lakshmi Rai. --------PETITIONER The Regional Manager and another. ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The 1st petitioner is the wife and the 2nd petitioner is the son, of one Balaiah, who was employed as a Driver in Asifabad
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
W.P.No.27501 of 2005
Date:27.12.2005
Lakshmi Rai.
The Regional Manager and another.
--------PETITIONER
---------RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The 1[st] petitioner is the wife and the 2[nd] petitioner is the son, of one Balaiah,who was employed as a Driver in Asifabad Depot of APSRTC, AdilabadDistrict, 2[nd] respondent herein. He is said to have died on 01.11.2005, while inservice. The 2[n d ]petitioner has made a representation on 29.11.2005 to therespondent, with a request to provide him employment, on compassionategrounds. The grievance of the petitioners is that that the respondents have notpassed any order as yet.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counselfor the respondents .
The question as to whether there exists any scheme for providing employmentto the dependants of the deceased-employees, on compassionate grounds, andif so, the terms thereof, needs to be examined, in the context of theconsideration of the application of the 2[nd] petitioner. It cannot be said that therewas undue delay on the part of the respondents in considering the case of the2[nd] petitioner, since the application was made as recently as on 29.11.2005.The respondents need to examine various aspects of the scheme as well as the entitlement of the 2[nd] petitioner.
Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to considerthe application of the 2[nd] petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, withina period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.There shall be no order as to costs.
Jsu
_________
27.12.2005