Telangana High Court
WP/40643/2014 of B. Vimala Kumari, Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.40643 of 2014 Dated: 30.12.2014 Between: B.Vimala Kumari. .. Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents Counsel for the
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.40643 of 2014Dated: 30.12.2014
Between:B.Vimala Kumari. .. Petitioner andThe State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by itsPrincipal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department,Secretariat, Hyderabadand others. .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.K.Narsi Reddy Counsel for the respondents : AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.5has not issued stock allotment order, to enable the petitioner to submitthe D.D for the value of the quota for the month of November, 2014.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forCivil Supplies (A.P) submitted that while there are no legalimpediments for respondent No.5 to issue stock allotment order, thepetitioner has not come forward to collect the stock allotment order andproduce the D.D. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that nointimation was given to the petitioner regarding the stock allotmentorder. Be that as it may, as the learned Assistant Government Pleaderstated that respondent No.5 will issue stock allotment order from themonth of January, 2015, the petitioner is permitted to approachrespondent No.5. On the petitioner so approaching, respondent No.5shall issue stock allotment order and receive the D.Ds that may besubmitted by the petitioner for release of the essential commoditiesfrom the month of January, 2015.
With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P.No.50945 of 2014, filed by the petitionerfor interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.
_____________________
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J