Telangana High Court
WP/27730/2005 of A.P.Power Generating Employees Union (Regd.No.E-1535) Vs The General Manager (IR) A.P.Power Generation on 28 December 2005
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No. 27730 of 2005 Between: A.P.Power Generating Employees Union (Regd.No.E-1535)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No. 27730 of 2005
Between:
A.P.Power Generating Employees Union (Regd.No.E-1535)
H.Q-SRT-30"A" colony V.T.P.S.rep.by its RegionalSecretary, G.Prasad
..... PETITIONER
AND
The General Manager (IR) A.P.Power
Generation Corporation Limited, Vidyut Soudha,Somajiguda, Hyderabad-82 and another
.....RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Seeking a Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2[nd] respondent in not allotting thequarters for the members of the petitioner union at Srisailam Left Bank PowerStation Project on par with other unions pursuant to the MemoNo.CGM(IR)/DS(ser)/AS(ser-I)/PO.N/06/2005-2, dated 11.04.2005, as illegal andarbitrary, the present writ petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counselappearing for the respondents.
It is stated that the petitioner has made a representation before the 1[st] respondent on29.03.2005 for allotment of quarters to the members of the petitioner union and thesaid representation has been forwarded to the 2[nd] respondent, requesting to takenecessary action in the matter and report compliance, vide MemoNo.CGM(IR)/DS(Ser.)/AS(Ser-I)/PO.N/06/2005-2, dated 11.04.2005. But in spite ofthe said representation and the instructions issued by the 1[st] respondent, the 2[nd] respondent has not taken any action.
The 2[nd] respondent has to take appropriate decision on the representation of thepetitioner union pursuant to the directions issued by the 1[st] respondent dated11.04.2005 and has to implement the guidelines issued from time to time in allottingquarters on seniority basis.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the 2[nd] respondent is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, on theendorsement of the 1[st] respondent dated 11.04.2005 with regard to therepresentation of the petitioner union dated 29.03.2005, and dispose of the same,within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
________________
Dated: 28.12.2005
Dsr
V.ESWARAIAH,J