Telangana High Court
WP/26906/2006 of Md. Khaja Bee Vs The Gram Panchayat, Jawaharnagar (V) on 29 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26906 of 2006 29.12.2006 Between: Md.Khaja Bee, W/o.Dada Miya And others ... Petitioners AND The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Hyderabad And others. ...Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26906 of 2006
29.12.2006
Between:
Md.Khaja Bee, W/o.Dada Miya And others
AND
... Petitioners
The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh,Revenue Department, Hyderabad And others.
...Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26906 of 2006
ORDER:
The three petitioners are allegedly in occupation of 260Sq.yards, 144 Sq.yards and 244 Sq.yards respectively in surveyNo.260 of Jawaharnagar Village of Shameerpet Mandal in RangaReddy District. They allege that they are staying in the houses on theland bearing numbers given by the Gram Panchayat and duly payingthe taxes. They allege that second respondent made attempts to takepossession illegally without giving notice. Therefore, they filed instantwrit petition seeking appropriate relief.
Page 1 of 2
On 26.12.2006, the matter was heard at preliminary stage. Toenable the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue(Assignment), the matter was adjourned. Today, after obtaininginstructions, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submits thatthe land is Government land and when the petitioners tried to encroachupon the same, they were prevented. He denied all other allegations. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners arestaying in residential houses constructed on the Government land, thatthey are paying house tax/property tax to the Gram Panchayat andtherefore, the allegation that they are trying to encroach upon theGovernment land is not correct. The miscellaneous receipts issued byth e Grampanchayat filed along with the writ petition, prima facie,support the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners.Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the rights of thepetitioners to encroach upon the Government land or to seekregularization of such encroachment, the writ petition can be disposedof observing that if for any reason, the petitioners are liable to beevicted from the land in their possession, respondent No.4 shall takenecessary action in accordance with the provisions under the AndhraPradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
The writ petition, with the above observations and direction, isaccordingly disposed of. No costs.
_____________
December 29, 2006 (V.V.S.RAO, J)NOTE:Issue order copy by 02.1.2007.(By order)
YS
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…