Telangana High Court

WP/23045/2020 of M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt ltd Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 23045 OF 2020 M/s. Supermax

ij

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 23045 OF 2020

Between:

M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt ltd, No. 2, Jeedimetla Rd, Phase 1, IDAJeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055 Represented by itsAuthorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T Rammohan Rao, Aged about 50 years,Rl/o Hyderabad

...PETITIONER

AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT/Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST)Hyderabad Rural DivisionHyderabad Rural Division Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad

2

3State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularty in the nature of a writof mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.30710 [.dated ]3 1-05-20'1 8passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC OrderNo. 1215 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void,illegal, violative of Article 265 and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution oflndia, totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the principles of natural [justice.]

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tostay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to theassessment order A.O.No.30710 dated 31-03-2018 passed by the RespondentNo. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 1215 dated 29-06-2020passed by the Respondent No. 1.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. NAGA DEEPAK

Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 & 2: SRI K. RAJI REDDY(sc FoR coMMERCTAL TAX)

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following: ORDER

i

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIryANAND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.23O45 of 2O2O

ORDER: Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal BLtuAan)

Heard Mr. M.NagaDeepak, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr. K.RajiReddy, learned counsel for therespondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewith the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.

3. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed onwithdrawal.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shali standclosed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR [RAO]ASSISTANSTRAR

STRAR

/TTRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to [SRI M. NAGA DEEPAK, ][Advocate ][[OPUC]]

2. One CC to [SRI K. RAJI REDDY ][(SC ][FOR COMMERCIAL ][TAX) ][IOPUC]]

3. Two CCs [to ][GP ][FOR ][REVENUE, ][High Court for the State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad [OUT]Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CCs to [GP ][FOR COMMERCIAL ][TAX, ][High Court ][for ][the State ][of]Telangana at [HYderabad ][OUT]Telangana at [HYderabad ][OUT]

5. Two CD [CoPi]

\

HIGH COURT

DATED: 30|1212022

ORDER-/-'al. ./._.1WP.No.23045 of 2020Ifot1[Its][ 1s11]J,7%-pDISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTSr-)v1,o))

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead