Telangana High Court
CC/1334/2022 of Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao and another Vs Sri. Krishna Aditya and another on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1334OF 2022 Contempt case under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1334OF 2022
Contempt case under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act toPunish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the HighCourt dated. 17.O9.2021 W.P.No. 22419 of 2021 .
Between:
1. Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao, S/o. Madhava Rao, Age 56 years, Occ Agricultureand Business, R/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, WarangalDistrict.and Business, R/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, WarangalDistrict.
2. Kallepu Sumalatha, W/o. Vidyasagar Rao, Age 48 Years, Occ Housewife,Rt/o- H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.Rt/o- H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS.
AND
1. Sri. Krishna Aditya, The District Collector, Mulugu District, Mulugu.
2. Sri. Satyanarayana Swamy, The Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar, Mulugu,Mulugu Proper, Mandal and District.Mulugu Proper, Mandal and District.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS No'S. 2 & 3
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K VENUMADHAV
Counsel for the Respondent No. R1 and R2: G.P. for Revenue [(TS)]
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
\
THE HC N'BLE SRI IUSTICE A. ABHISI{EK l(trDI)Y
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Co rtempt Case is filed alleging willlui disoiredience tothe order date777.09.2021 passed by this Court in V/.1).No.22419of2027.
The respondent No.2 has filed a counter-affi lavit statingthat the onlfu re applications of the petitionerst^'(l)'ealreadyconsidered an 1 rejected aide ord.er dated 18.06.2021 i.e., muchprior to the o der dated 17.09.2021 passed by this iiruri: in thewrit petition.
Having :egard to the above, this Contenrpt C,rsr-' is closedleaving it ope r to the petitioners to challengr: the o.rdel dated18.06.202'l befc re appropriate forum, if they are so ag1;rievt:d.
Miscella reous Applications, if any pending, shall alsostand closed. T rere shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/. T.SRINIVASDl:PUw.RE?rsrRAR//TRUE copy// l'+t).,- To, sEcTtoN oFFICER'1. Two CCs to G p. for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangitna, atHyderabad (O jT)
3. 2. Sri. Krishna A< itvb. ,and Swamy, itvb. Tne Distr_ict Distr_ict Th; C_ollector, T"h;iil;;"^jj"iii"dru Mulugu C_ollector, T"h;iil;;"^jj"iii"dru Mulugu Mulugu District, I\lulugu.R,)sistrar, I\lulugu.
Sri. Satyanara A< itvb. ,and Swamy, itvb. Tne Distr_ict Distr_ict Th; C_ollector, T"h;iil;;"^jj"iii"dru Mulugu District, I\lulugu.R,)sistrar, I\lulugu.Mutusu.Oistrict. [- ][-]_ [Mulugu ][Proper. ][Mandal and ]4. One CC to SF t. K VENUMADHAV, Advocate 5. Two CD Copie;IOPUC]
ll
HIGH COURT
DATED:30'1212022
ORDERCC.No.1334 of 2022
CLOSING'IHE C ]NTEMPT CASE
@,\r-.
a{ [C][,s,][ 1HE ][S ][i4][ )'{:]/,ti:l)(2 B ,illt zltl)t+7\it