Telangana High Court

WP/19841/2020 of Telugu Film Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) and 2 Others on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER /. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY -' Between: Telugu Fllm Producers

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER [/.]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY -'

WRIT PETITION NO: 19841 OF 2020

Between:

Telugu Fllm Producers lvlutually Aided Cooperative Society Ltd., Sy. No.239and 240, lt/ovie Towers, Kokapet, Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist. Represented byits authorized signatory, Mr. Tammareddy Bharadwaj, S/o. GopalTammareddy, Aged about 72 Years, R/o. Hyderabad PETITIONER ,..--

AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST),Hyderabad Rural DivisionHyderabad Rural Division

2. Assistant Commissione(ST), Special Commodities Circle, SaroornagarDivision, Hyd.Division, Hyd.

3. State of Telangana, Represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS ['-]

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writof mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 43384 dated 0610912018passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC OrderNo. 1757 dated 24l09l2020passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void,illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution oflndia, totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the principles of natural [justice]lA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tostay all further proceedings and consequential actions [pursuant ]to the A.O.No.

43384 dated 06/09/2018 [passed ]by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently theimpugned ADC Order No. 1757 daled 24l09l2O20passed by the RespondentNo.1

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. NAGA DEEPAKCounsel for the Respondents: SRl. K. RAJI REDDY,SC The Court made the following: ORDER

/

THD HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHI'YANAND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.19841 of 2O2O

ORDER: i'er rlp tlotl'ble ttrc CtLief,lusrice UJJaI Bluryai)

Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for thepctitioner ernd Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned counscl lbr therespondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Time Settiement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewith thc State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.

3. ln vierv of the above, writ petition is dismissed onrvithdr:xval To, Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall standcloscd. However, there shall be no order as to costs.Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH [ANSARI]ASSISTANT [RFGISTRAR]//TRUE COPY'/ le----,-'SECTION [OFFICER]

1 ' ' Two CCs to GP to GP GP [[FOR COMMERCIAL ]][[TAX' ][High ][Court ]][[High ][Court ]][[Court ]][for the State of]

Two CCs to GP to GP GP [[FOR COMMERCIAL ]][[TAX' ][High ][Court ]][[High ][Court ]][[Court ]]1 ' ' i"tinoana. at HvderabadloUTlpAK, Advocate [opUC] 1 ' ' i"tinoana. at HvderabadloUTlpAK, Advocate [opUC]

1-

3 3lE 3313 [3Ei ][flJHPA',*(SC), ][AdvocateroPUCl]4. Two [CD ][coPies]4. Two [CD ][coPies]

BM|'w.

HIGH COURT

DATED:3011212022

ORDERWP.No. 19841 [OF ][2020]$E- [S ][rA]14:(co(j1gJ't.l).//N-r DISMISSING [THE ][WP DRAWAL]WITHOUT [COSTS]@t*t,rs\\rz

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead