Telangana High Court
CRP/7181/2017 of Naresh Kumar Vs Smt. C. Kamalamma on 31 December 2020
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7181 OF 2017 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order dated. 30.10.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 7181 OF 2017
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order dated.30.10.2017 passed in l.A.No. 98 of 2015 in O.S.No. 26 of 2012 on the file of the Courtof The I Junior Civil Judge, C ity C ivil Court, at Secunderabad.
Between:
1. Naresh Kumar, S/o. late Harishankar, Aged about: 53 Years. Occ: Business,2. Govindram, S/o. late Harishankar, Aged about: 51 Years, Occ: Business, Bothare residents of H.No. FIat No.7, BHEL Colony, Viman Nagar, Secunderabad.2. Govindram, S/o. late Harishankar, Aged about: 51 Years, Occ: Business, Bothare residents of H.No. FIat No.7, BHEL Colony, Viman Nagar, Secunderabad.
...Petitioners/Petitioners/Plaintiffs
AND
Smt C. Kamalamma, W/o. late Rajeswara Rao, Aged about: 60 Years, Occ:Housewife, R/o. H.No. 3-2-31, ll Floor, Avulamanda, Secunderabad.
...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP. NO: 9224OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased ]to [grant ]stay of all furtherproceedings in O.S.No. 26 of 2012 on the file of the I Junior Civil Judge, City CivilCourt, Secunderabad, [pending ]disposal of the Civil Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SHARAD SANGHI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. RANGANATHANThe Court made the following: ORDER
I
Page 1 of 2
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. [SRI DEVI]CIVIL REVISION PETITION [NO][ 7181 ][0F ][2][ot7]
ORDER:
Learned counsel lor the [petitioners ][u'ould submit ][that ][the]cause in t1'ris revision does not survive further [adj ][udici.rtior-r ][and ][Lhe]levision has bccome infructuotis.
I11 lhat \/ieu ol the mattcr, rccoiding the saicl sltlllnissiol-t. [lhe]Civil Rcvision Petition is dismissed as infructuor,ts. ['fhcrc ]shal] beno orclc'r irs to costs.
\4isct'llant'otts applicati,rns. il ilnr'. pcnclinl slrrll slattcl clism is sccl.
sd/[.N.CHANDRASEKHAR ][RAO]ASSISTANT [REGIS]
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION [OFFICER]
To,1. The I Junior [Civil ][Judge, City ][Civil ][Court, at Secunderabad']1. The I Junior [Civil ][Judge, City ][Civil ][Court, at Secunderabad']
2. One CC to [Sri Sharad Sanghi, Advocate ][[OPUC]]3. One CC to Sri. R' [Ranganathan, Advocate ][[OPUC]]4. Two CD CoPies3. One CC to Sri. R' [Ranganathan, Advocate ][[OPUC]]4. Two CD CoPies,h\- t .,s!ry, HIGH COURTGSDJ
DATED:3111212020
ORDERCRP.No.7181 ot 2017
1l1Es14rtloo2 2 JAit 2021zCfFt,c?-o
DISMISSTNG THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS [INFRUCTUOUS]WITHOUT COSTS
\q\[\\)\].dr{2(
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…