Telangana High Court
WP/22197/2003 of CRESHE (Centre for Rural Enlightenment Salvation for Vs The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 22197 of 2003 Between: CRESHE (Centre for Rural Enlightenment Salvation for Health and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO : 22197 of 2003
Between:
CRESHE (Centre for Rural Enlightenment Salvation for Health andEnvironment) 3-1-96/1, Sri Chaitanya Nagar,Behind CSI Church, IndiraNagar, Khammam rep. by its Executive Director, P. Krishna Rao
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District 2 The Project Director DRDA (District Rural Development Agency)
Khammam
3 The Executive Director, District Schedule Caste Co-operative Society Ltd., Khammam
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction preferably a writ inthe nature of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to order inRC.No. CC/122/SC/2002 dt. 10-10-2003 issued by the 1st respondent and toquash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice and also violative of At.14 of the Constitution of India and alsomalafide and consequently suspend the said order.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.VENUGOPAL, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURALDEV.
FOR RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2.
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that therespondents have decided to lift the black listing of the petitionersubject to withdrawing the writ petition and therefore he is instructed bythe petitioner to seek permission for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Permission is accorded and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No costs.
__________________
G. ROHINI, J.
28[th ]December, 2004.
BJ/
Note: Issue C.C. in two days.
B/o.
BJ
To
1 The District Collector, Khammam, Khammam District 2 The Project Director DRDA (District Rural Development Agency)Khammam 3 The Executive Director, District Schedule Caste Co-operative SocietyLtd., Khammam
4. Two C.Cs. to G.P. for Panchayat Rau & Rural Dev. High Court Blds. Hyderabad (O.U.T)
5. Two C.C. Copies.
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
Note: c.c. in two days
W.P. NO. 22197 OF 2004
28[TH] DECEMBER, 2004